Description: The string "Degrees freedom" can be found in several places in LO. AFAICT it refers to degrees of freedom: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Degrees_of_freedom "Degrees freedom" does not seem to be a common/correct way of writing it, so I suggest that it should be changed to "Degrees of freedom". Steps to Reproduce: 1. See https://translations.documentfoundation.org/languages/en/libo_ui-master/search/?offset=1&q=%22degrees+freedom%22&sort_by=-priority%2Cposition&checksum= Actual Results: "Degrees freedom" is used. Expected Results: "Degrees of freedom" is used. Reproducible: Always User Profile Reset: No Additional Info: n/a
You may be interested in this one, Seth
Thanks for your query Tuomas. I agree with you that "degrees freedom" is not common in everyday communication, but in this case, the phrase is being used as a kind of "tip" to explain statistical functions in Calc. To see it "in action" -- 1. Open Calc document. 2. Insert Function (or Ctrl+F2) 3. Search TINV (or FINV, or F.D or F.I, etc.) 4. Select one of the functions (e.g., TINV). Actual: See on right side of dialog window the function with "Degrees freedom". The strings that appear in the right side (and that you found in your search) come from sc/inc/scfuncs.hrc In this context, I believe users understand/recognize, maybe even prefer "Degrees freedom". You can read about these functions in https://help.libreoffice.org/7.6/en-US/text/scalc/01/04060182.html (for F*) https://help.libreoffice.org/7.6/en-US/text/scalc/01/04060185.html (for t-tests) where @Adolfo, we can see another problem: "DegreeFreedom" appears throughout. I assume it is not worth triggering retranslation just to add a space -- but I will leave that decision to others. Summa summarum: NAB (imo)
(was about to say something very similar to Seth when our comments conflicted. Here's the updated version.) Keeping it short in these function models is justified, but the use is inconsistent throughout. - 23 times "Degrees freedom": https://opengrok.libreoffice.org/more/core/sc/inc/scfuncs.hrc?full=%22degrees+freedom%22 - 4 times "Degrees of Freedom": https://opengrok.libreoffice.org/more/core/sc/inc/scfuncs.hrc?full=%22degrees+of+freedom%22 The important thing is sticking to one form (and case) for all functions. The inconsistency is noticeable for example when going from function CHISQ.INV to CHISQ.INV.RT, which us two different forms. Adding "of" is not a big cost space-wise, but there are lots more example of more drastic abbreviations (for example STDEV for standard deviation), so it doesn't shock me. I agree with Seth that we might not want to extend these. But I do think we need to fix the inconsistency.
If you translate the German "Freiheitsgrade" literally it becomes "Freedom degrees". I never heard of such thing (nor the swapped), it's clearly "Degrees of freedom" in English. The common abbreviation is DF but I think we don't need to shorten this term.
Dear Tuomas Hietala, To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo'; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: https://web.libera.chat/?settings=#libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug