Bug 158722 - assertion failure on 24.2.0.0 beta1 for DesktopLOKTest::testPaintPartTileDifferentSchemes in test_desktop_lib.cxx
Summary: assertion failure on 24.2.0.0 beta1 for DesktopLOKTest::testPaintPartTileDiff...
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Alias: None
Product: LibreOffice
Classification: Unclassified
Component: LibreOffice (show other bugs)
Version:
(earliest affected)
24.2.0.0 alpha1+
Hardware: Other All
: medium normal
Assignee: Not Assigned
URL:
Whiteboard: needsS390x
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks: Crash-Assert
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2023-12-15 16:24 UTC by Gwyn Ciesla
Modified: 2024-01-09 22:05 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Crash report or crash signature:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Gwyn Ciesla 2023-12-15 16:24:42 UTC
On s390x:

test_desktop_lib.cxx:2325:Assertion
Test name: DesktopLOKTest::testPaintPartTileDifferentSchemes
equality assertion failed
- Expected: rgba[1c1c1cff]
- Actual  : rgba[ff1c1cff]

On aarch64 and x86_64:

complextext.cxx:553:Assertion
Test name: testTdf107718::TestBody
assertion failed
- Expression: pGlyphItem->glyphId()
Comment 1 Rene Engelhard 2023-12-15 17:20:27 UTC
> On aarch64 and x86_64:
>
> complextext.cxx:553:Assertion
> Test name: testTdf107718::TestBody
> assertion failed
> - Expression: pGlyphItem->glyphId()

See https://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?h=libreoffice-24-2&id=2c8e0630097477cdfbcd481d27893f34a179a69e and https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice/2023-December/091278.html ff.
Comment 2 Rene Engelhard 2023-12-15 17:21:40 UTC
(ignore the commit ID mentioned in the commit, that one is wrong...)
Comment 3 Gwyn Ciesla 2023-12-15 22:40:03 UTC
Looks like we get farther now:

_RUN_____] (anonymous namespace)::BasicTest::validInputTest
/builddir/build/BUILD/libreoffice-24.2.0.0.beta1/unoxml/qa/unit/domtest.cxx:224:(anonymous namespace)::BasicTest::validInputTest
assertion failed
- Expression: false
- Valid input file did not result in XDocument (exception thrown)

(anonymous namespace)::BasicTest::validInputTest finished in: 11ms
[_RUN_____] (anonymous namespace)::BasicTest::warningInputTest
/builddir/build/BUILD/libreoffice-24.2.0.0.beta1/unoxml/qa/unit/domtest.cxx:238:(anonymous namespace)::BasicTest::warningInputTest
assertion failed
- Expression: false
- Valid input file did not result in XDocument #2 (exception thrown)

(anonymous namespace)::BasicTest::warningInputTest finished in: 1ms
[_RUN_____] (anonymous namespace)::BasicTest::errorInputTest
(anonymous namespace)::BasicTest::errorInputTest finished in: 0ms
[_RUN_____] (anonymous namespace)::SerializerTest::serializerTest
/builddir/build/BUILD/libreoffice-24.2.0.0.beta1/unoxml/qa/unit/domtest.cxx:334:(anonymous namespace)::SerializerTest::serializerTest
assertion failed
- Expression: false
- Valid input file did not result in XDocument (exception thrown)

(anonymous namespace)::SerializerTest::serializerTest finished in: 0ms
domtest.cxx:224:Assertion
Test name: (anonymous namespace)::BasicTest::validInputTest
assertion failed
- Expression: false
- Valid input file did not result in XDocument (exception thrown)

domtest.cxx:238:Assertion
Test name: (anonymous namespace)::BasicTest::warningInputTest
assertion failed
- Expression: false
- Valid input file did not result in XDocument #2 (exception thrown)

domtest.cxx:334:Assertion
Test name: (anonymous namespace)::SerializerTest::serializerTest
assertion failed
- Expression: false
- Valid input file did not result in XDocument (exception thrown)
Comment 4 Gwyn Ciesla 2023-12-15 22:43:57 UTC
Which looks like: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158423
Comment 5 Stéphane Guillou (stragu) 2023-12-29 22:07:28 UTC
Gwyn and Rene, if the remaining issue is bug 158423, are we OK to close this one as fixed?
Comment 6 Rene Engelhard 2023-12-30 09:18:55 UTC
 Afaics the s390x failure is not handled anywhere?
Comment 7 Gwyn Ciesla 2024-01-02 18:26:17 UTC
(In reply to Stéphane Guillou (stragu) from comment #5)
> Gwyn and Rene, if the remaining issue is bug 158423, are we OK to close this
> one as fixed?

If s390x is fixed for this, yes.
Comment 9 Gwyn Ciesla 2024-01-09 22:05:01 UTC
s390x failure persists with 24.2.0.1 final.