Bug 158834 - Border box
Summary: Border box
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 158818
Alias: None
Product: LibreOffice
Classification: Unclassified
Component: LibreOffice (show other bugs)
Version:
(earliest affected)
7.6.4.1 release
Hardware: All Windows (All)
: medium normal
Assignee: Not Assigned
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2023-12-22 13:22 UTC by Priya Dharshini P
Modified: 2023-12-27 10:58 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Crash report or crash signature:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Priya Dharshini P 2023-12-22 13:22:34 UTC
Description:
If the style of the first character after a list ordinal matches the style of the list ordinal itself, then the border box of the list ordinal vanishes.

Steps to reproduce:
1. Create a list, be it numbered or bulleted.
2. Style the list in a way that the list ordinals proudly wear their border boxes.
3. For an extra touch, assign a custom style to the list ordinal. You can make it bold and paint it in a delightful shade of blue. (This step is optional but recommended for our test case.)
4.apply the very same style to the text right next to the list ordinal.

Actual Result:
Border box disappear.

Excepted Result:

Border box should not disappear.
Comment 1 Stéphane Guillou (stragu) 2023-12-22 22:44:27 UTC
Please share your version info copied from Help > About LibreOffice.
Comment 2 Priya Dharshini P 2023-12-23 06:49:08 UTC
Version: 7.6.4.1
Windows 10
Comment 3 QA Administrators 2023-12-24 03:12:44 UTC Comment hidden (obsolete)
Comment 4 libretist 2023-12-25 00:44:04 UTC
probably duplicate of bug#158818
Comment 5 Stéphane Guillou (stragu) 2023-12-27 10:58:08 UTC
Reproduced in:

Version: 7.6.4.1 (X86_64) / LibreOffice Community
Build ID: e19e193f88cd6c0525a17fb7a176ed8e6a3e2aa1
CPU threads: 8; OS: Linux 5.15; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3
Locale: en-AU (en_AU.UTF-8); UI: en-US
Calc: threaded

(In reply to libretist from comment #4)
> probably duplicate of bug#158818
Yes, let's mark as such.

Thank you!

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 158818 ***