(Translating Back from German, so the exact phrases may be inaccurate) I think this is a regression against the last version 6: When using a few character styles and filtering to "used styles", the default "no style" is not present. So when you effectively want to cancel a character style you need this (AFAIK). That means, in turn, that you ave to switch to filter "all styles" temporarily. The is is rather bad for work efficiency. See also bug 160555. Version being used: Version: 24.2.3.2 (x86) / LibreOffice Community Build ID: 433d9c2ded56988e8a90e6b2e771ee4e6a5ab2ba CPU threads: 8; OS: Windows 10.0 Build 19045; UI render: Skia/Raster; VCL: win Locale: de-DE (de_DE); UI: de-DE Calc: CL threaded
(In reply to Ulrich Windl from comment #0) > When using a few character styles and filtering to "used styles", the > default "no style" is not present. There is no such style (unless you defined it). Do you mean "Default Paragraph Style"? If you do, then I can't reproduce the bug. Otherwise please explain.
Created attachment 194329 [details] Screenshot showing the "no style" character style when displaying all styles (In reply to Eyal Rozenberg from comment #1) > There is no such style (unless you defined it). Do you mean "Default > Paragraph Style"? If you do, then I can't reproduce the bug. Otherwise > please explain. As said, I had to guess what the names are in English. See screenshot what I mean (the first one).
Created attachment 194330 [details] Screenshot showing used styles only You see that the "no style" is missing in the list.
[Automated Action] NeedInfo-To-Unconfirmed
Created attachment 194355 [details] Simple test case Sorry, I misread, confirming with: Version: 24.8.0.0.alpha0+ (X86_64) / LibreOffice Community Build ID: 92815f3a464b447898ecf52492247335228e4a72 CPU threads: 4; OS: Linux 6.6; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3 Locale: he-IL (en_IL); UI: en-US
Reproduction instructions: 1. Open attachment 194355 [details] 2. Switch to the Stylist on the sidebar 3. Click "Character Styles". You'll see only "Emphasis", even though there's also text in "No Character Style".
Isn't this a duplicate of bug 159168?
(In reply to Robert Großkopf from comment #7) > Isn't this a duplicate of bug 159168? Yes, thank you! *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 159168 ***