Description: There are two connected frames with text and a graphic or/and an image, positioned on the lower border of frame1 and upper border of frame2. The wrap with spacing is only correct in that frame, where the anchor is placed. Actual Results: there is no correct wrap in the other frame as in the frame with anchor of figure or graphic Expected Results: correct wrap in both frames Reproducible: Always User Profile Reset: No Additional Info: produce correct wrap in every frames
Created attachment 194925 [details] example of the incorrect graphic and figure wrap if places in two connected frames
You want an imaged anchored in a frame, applying the wrap in a different frame. Doesn't look to me as a bug, but a not implemented possibility. Which BTW doesn't seem too easy having it implemented. How many things needs to be taken in account to get it up.
I can see one expects the wrap setting to also "overflow" to the next linked frame just like the text does. And how that would help with composing some layouts. Same in OOo 3.3, so inherited. Mike, I thought you might have an opinion on this?
Created attachment 194967 [details] minimal ODT
it is of course inconsistent. It is natural to expect wrapping to work also in other objects. On the other hand, it is really complex, because here, the objects may overlap and have Z-order that is different from their anchoring order; their overlap settings could conflict, and so on. The anchor inside a frame establishes a direct relation between the objects, making implementation of the existing behavior much more straightforward. I couldn't get MS Word to do any kind of wrapping of one shape's text around another. We have two kinds of objects (text box implemented using edit engine, and frame implemented using Writer layout engine), and only the latter allows nested anchoring; in Word, the text objects are of the same kind, and in this regards, they behave like our text boxes. So it is not an interoperability bug. I set to new, enhancement, and low prio.