Bug 165962 - The page of the portable version does not update
Summary: The page of the portable version does not update
Status: RESOLVED MOVED
Alias: None
Product: LibreOffice
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Documentation (show other bugs)
Version:
(earliest affected)
25.2.1.2 release
Hardware: All All
: medium normal
Assignee: Not Assigned
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
: 166029 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2025-03-29 07:52 UTC by nobu
Modified: 2025-04-03 16:14 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

See Also:
Crash report or crash signature:

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description nobu 2025-03-29 07:52:40 UTC 
Description:
The portable version of the page does not update.

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Open "https://www.libreoffice.org/download/portable-versions/"


Actual Results:
2. There is no link for portable version 25.2.1.

Expected Results:
2. There is a link for the portable version of Version 25.2.1.


Reproducible: Always


User Profile Reset: No

Additional Info:
---
Past versions have added a link to the portable version.
https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/25.2.1.2/
Comment 1 raal 2025-03-29 08:50:56 UTC 
CC Mike
Comment 2 Buovjaga 2025-03-29 10:10:21 UTC 
Please in the future send website topics to the website mailing list: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Website#comm
Comment 3 nobu 2025-04-03 07:46:58 UTC 
Why are portable versions outdated so much?
https://ask.libreoffice.org/t/why-are-portable-versions-outdated-so-much/120382
Comment 4 Mike Kaganski 2025-04-03 08:04:06 UTC 
(In reply to Buovjaga from comment #2)

I see the resolution as "resolved/moved". But isn't it mandatory to mention, moved *to where*? I suppose, we need a bot to reject such resolution without a target link (and it would need an intelligence, to tell the link in comment 2 from a proper target link ;-D)
Comment 5 Buovjaga 2025-04-03 08:06:42 UTC 
(In reply to Mike Kaganski from comment #4)
> (In reply to Buovjaga from comment #2)
> 
> I see the resolution as "resolved/moved". But isn't it mandatory to mention,
> moved *to where*? I suppose, we need a bot to reject such resolution without
> a target link (and it would need an intelligence, to tell the link in
> comment 2 from a proper target link ;-D)

It was an optimistic resolution. If nobu refuses to email website list, then the optimism was unfounded.
Comment 6 Buovjaga 2025-04-03 16:14:36 UTC 
*** Bug 166029 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***