Created attachment 53299 [details] The attachment is .doc file with frames and checkboxes that wasn't properly imported Problem description: when .doc file with (a)frames (b) checkboxes open, then (a) frames are shifted to the left and down; (b) checkboxes not recognized Steps to reproduce: 1. open an attached .doc file in LO and check appearance vs. original design Current behavior: (a) frames are shifted to the left and down;(b) checkboxes not recognized Expected behavior:to be the same design as original .doc file Platform (if different from the browser): Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1) AppleWebKit/535.2 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/15.0.874.106 Safari/535.2
1. Which platform? 2. Please submit a screen shot, indicating the elements that are misplaced.
Created attachment 58987 [details] The attachment is 1st of 2 screenshots of .doc file with frames and checkboxes that wasn't properly imported
Created attachment 58988 [details] The attachment is 2nd of 2 screenshots of .doc file with frames and checkboxes that wasn't properly imported
1. Platform is Windows XP SP3 2. With v.3.5.1. placement of frames greatly improved. Check boxes that I mentioned before appeared to be just squares in MS Word, so no exactly check-box issue here, but please see 2 screenshots, I marked on the 1st pages of the converted .odt problems: 1) document itself is a bit shifted to the left; 2) tabulators - occasionally; 3) few check-box like squares converted into 14 7 digits; 4) a text box in the footer is of smaller size and is misplaced; 5) all narrow frames appears like bold one
(In reply to comment #0) > Created attachment 53299 [details] This is part B3 (In reply to comment #3) > Created attachment 58988 [details] This is part B2, a screen shot of a different document
Sorry, indeed screenshots are about converting B3.doc. Further on I attach 4 screenshots of B3, which shows all the same issues like B2 (except wrong tabulators in the body text, but wrong tabulators in the footer - the latter is same in B@, just was left without attention), and one extra issue- one small check-box style square box after converting became unusually large (page 3)
Created attachment 59010 [details] Screenshots of problematic issue when converting B3.doc into .odt with LO 3.5.1. 1st of 4
Created attachment 59011 [details] Screenshots of problematic issue when converting B3.doc into .odt with LO 3.5.1. 2nd of 4
Created attachment 59012 [details] Screenshots of problematic issue when converting B3.doc into .odt with LO 3.5.1. 3rd of 4
Created attachment 59013 [details] Screenshots of problematic issue when converting B3.doc into .odt with LO 3.5.1. 4th of 4
this is not a valid Bug report: <http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/BugReport#General_information> item 4 It' not useful to report something like "open document and try to find out whether something is wrong At least some of the screenshots do not match with the sample document I was not able to reproduce with 3.5.5.3: a) wrong checkbox position under "3.1. Izmaiņas biedrības statūtos" b) wrong caption position in Page footers I found some smaller wrong formatting or position problems, but I do not know whether those are discussed in "52103 - FILEOPEN: DOC Import filter not properly dealing with a) borders b) text box c) tables " So I close this report, we will not get any result here @Sergejs Ušakovs Can you please report new bugs for still existing problems not reported in other Bug reports? You can reference to screenshots and sample document here <https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA-FAQ#How_to_use_attached_sample_documents_for_multiple_Bug_Reports>, Please provide a clear description for each like "in document ... under heading "sjoninoi" you see chekcbox 1mm too far to left (see screenshot yyy), " or similar.
First, I have reported this bug for 3.5.5.3 in the bug52103 for the similar file B2.doc, and straight after filing that bug, I have attached the link to the bug52103 here. There the bug52103 has been confirmed, although on 3.6.0.1 release - as far as I understood it is not worth to check with current release,as "train has already gone" - and test with the release that is currently work in progress. Second, surely I have been not practising an approach "open document and try to find out whether something is wrong" here, as on the screenshot the artefacts are marked by graphic elements like circles etc. Third, in respect of checkbox in 3.1. - as far as I see that was mistaken reporting, as that small box is n't check box in MSO 2007, sorry for that, but the rest are all valid. Fourth, I see that all points that has been discussed in bug52103 for 3.6.0.1 for B2.veidlapa.doc are valid for the file B3.veidlapa.doc - most bar two artefacts still present ) : - improvements a) was on the 3rd page , where those small square boxes remaining check-boxes now appears correctly b) placement of "lapa" in the footer is now correct; - additional artefact has come: in the footer, now there is a large border for the page number - first problem is the size of the border - it is just too large, it should of the size of text box for page number, second problem is the that border line should much thinner; - the rest of artefacts still there: a) too thick inner borderlines b) inserted few empty lines in Header on 1st page - disappears when header is forcedly deleted after import, as there is no header in the original I suggest too, to continue to discuss this issue at bug52103
Created attachment 65872 [details] PDF, produced from first attachment using msOffice 2007
I have compared documents, but can not find problems except that on 2-th page horizontal borders of cells slightly differs @ Sergejs Ušakovs If problem still exist, please, tell where exactly it is
I ahve tested now on Version 3.6.2.2 (Build ID: da8c1e6): IT'S EXCELLENT! THANKS!! I think it was worth of efforts to make Templates converted wekk with .doc filetr. There are few very minor artifacts - some minor shifts of few elemnts, but it doens' t affect funcionlity, and do not impact appearnce in any material way, so it doesn't seems to be really important to improve it up to 100% perfection. But if you need it, I can described it and attach screenshots.
Thanks for additional testing > But if you need it, I can described it and attach screenshots May be in next year. Today developers are too busy. Sorry.