Created attachment 53478 [details] Sample document showing the problem Create a document with outline levels in Calligra Words and open that in LibreOffice. We find that the outline numbers are not shown. Attached is a document created in Calligra Words having the problem
Thanks for bugreport What site http://odf-validator.rhcloud.com/ tells about attached file: list101.odt/META-INF/manifest.xml: Warning: The directory 'Thumbnails/' is not a sub-document and should not be listed in the 'META-INF/manifest.xml' file of ODF package 'list101.odt'! list101.odt/styles.xml[99,109]: Error: attribute "style:name" has a bad value: "Numbering Style for Head 11" does not satisfy the "NCName" type list101.odt/styles.xml[113,254]: Error: unexpected attribute "text:note-continuation-notice-forward" list101.odt/content.xml[18,75]: Error: element "text:h" is missing "id" attribute ---end of citation--- PS: msOffice 2007 opens attached file correctly.
Confirmed. Marking as NEW, setting Priority, changing title as it's not a FILEOPEN issue. Set as Minor (makes it somewhat harder to make professional quality work if using both Calligra and LO) and Low because I doubt this affects many users.
** Please read this message in its entirety before responding ** To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present on a currently supported version of LibreOffice (4.3.5 or later): https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the version of LibreOffice and your operating system, and any changes you see in the bug behavior If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a short comment that includes your version of LibreOffice and Operating System Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) Thank you for your help! -- The LibreOffice QA Team
Reproduced. Win 7 Pro 64-bit Version: 4.5.0.0.alpha0+ Build ID: 07e84cae983c08afdba03018413a19d01abb3006 TinderBox: Win-x86@62-TDF, Branch:MASTER, Time: 2015-01-19_06:15:38
** Please read this message in its entirety before responding ** To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present on a currently supported version of LibreOffice (5.0.5 or 5.1.0) https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the version of LibreOffice and your operating system, and any changes you see in the bug behavior If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a short comment that includes your version of LibreOffice and Operating System Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) http://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to "inherited from OOo"; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add "regression" to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=libreoffice-qa Thank you for your help! -- The LibreOffice QA Team This NEW Message was generated on: 2016-02-21
Repro with 6.1+. If Head 1 is cleared from direct formatting, then numbering appears.
** Please read this message in its entirety before responding ** To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from http://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo'; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: https://kiwiirc.com/nextclient/irc.freenode.net/#libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug
Should this bug still be open? As I understand the problem, a program from 2011 has produced a document that does not behave as expected in LO. In comment #7, it was noted that the problem was "resolved" by Clearing Direct Formatting. But notice this alternative procedure. 1. Open the attachment. 2. Place cursor on first line (Head1) (same story for third line with Head2) 3. Format > Paragraph 4. Notice that "Numbering Style" is "None" 5. View > Styles (F11) (Right-click on "Head 1"- Modify) 6. Notice that "Numbering Style" is "Numbering Style for Head 1" 7. Apply the style "Head 1" to the first line (even though it appears that this is the applied style (e.g., use drop-down box in Toolbar and Choose "Head 1" -- even though it is already selected, or double-click on "Head 1" in Styles window) Result: Expected behavior is observed. Explanations: As the procedure here showed, the attached document did not have the right numbering style for the paragraph style. The comment #7 procedure of clearing direct formatting is functionally equivalent to (re-)applying the "Head 1" style. If the problem is that Calligra has not produced an adequate document then I would say "NOTOURBUG" There does not
You are right, let's close