Created attachment 56452 [details] Example of when the fill handle counts backwards and removes the dash. Problem description: Steps to reproduce: 1. Type 123456-0001 into any cell 2. Use the fill handle to fill a series down Current behavior: The number displayed in the second cell is 1234560000. It is removing the dashes from all subsequent cells as well. It also seems as if it is treating the original number 123456-0001 as a subtraction to get the next cell. Then it proceeds to add to the following numbers. If you start with 123456-0002 and fill down, the second cell contains 123456-0001, then from the third cell it continues as before. It will always count down until it hits -0000, in which case it removes the dash. Expected behavior: The filled cells should be adding to the first cell, without removing the dash. For instance, if I place 123456-0001 in the first cell and fill down, the second cell should contain 123456-0002 and so on. Platform: Windows 7 HP 64 Browser: Chrome/16.0.912.77
Created attachment 56454 [details] Sample document The current behavior is rather unforeseeable. OOo 3.1.1 handles all inputs as strings (what seems consequent for me), OOo 3.3 and LibO (I tested 3.3.0, I believe, inherited from OOo) does that strange behavior. For me that looks like a bug, but I don't know.
[Reproducible] with "LibreOffice 3.5.0 RC3 German UI/Locale [Build-ID: 7e68ba2-a744ebf-1f241b7-c506db1-7d53735] on German WIN7 Home Premium (64bit). From <discuss@de.libreoffice.org> I received the hint that in 'Sample 2012-02-01 15:46 UTC, Rainer Bielefeld' in Column "Copy paste from Bug report" the string has some tailing blanks, what cause the different behavior from Column A and Column B. So the problem has been reduced to the one from original report and sample. Fill handle should work on first substring recognized as number as shown in columns D ... F, current behavior IMHO is wrong. I did some tests with 2 simple string "100-10" and also "100 10", here the fill handle results! Reference OOo 3.1.1 100-10 100 10 101-10 101 10 102-10 102 10 103-10 103 10 OK "LibreOffice Portable 3.3.0 - WIN7 Home Premium (64bit) German UI [OOO330m19 (Build:6) tag libreoffice-3.3.0.4]" 100-10 100 10 100-9 101 10 100-8 102 10 100-7 103 10 NOT OK, see 3.4.5 "LibreOffice 3.4.5 German UI [Build ID: OOO340m1 (Build:502)]" parallel Server installation on German WIN7 Home Premium (64bit) 100-10 100 10 100-9 101 10 100-8 102 10 100-7 103 10 . 100-1 109 10 1000 110 10 1001 111 10 NOT OK, second substring used for creating series 100-0 modified to 1000 "LibreOffice 3.5.0" 100-10 100 10 100-9 101 10 100-8 102 10 100-7 103 10 NOT OK, see 3.4.5! Also NOT OK with OOo 3.3, so problem seems inherited from OOo @Kohei Please feel free to reassign (or reset Assignee to default) if itβs not your area or if provided information is not sufficient. Please set Status to ASSIGNED if you accept this Bug.
** Please read this message in its entirety before responding ** To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present on a currently supported version of LibreOffice (4.4.0.3 or later): https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the version of LibreOffice and your operating system, and any changes you see in the bug behavior If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a short comment that includes your version of LibreOffice and Operating System Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) Thank you for your help! -- The LibreOffice QA Team This NEW Message was generated on: 2015-02-19
Reproduced. Win 7 Pro 64-bit, LibO Version: 4.4.1.2 Build ID: 45e2de17089c24a1fa810c8f975a7171ba4cd432 Locale: fi_FI
** Please read this message in its entirety before responding ** To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present on a currently supported version of LibreOffice (5.0.5 or 5.1.2 https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the version of LibreOffice and your operating system, and any changes you see in the bug behavior If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a short comment that includes your version of LibreOffice and Operating System Please DO NOT - Update the version field - Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) - Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) http://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to "inherited from OOo"; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add "regression" to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=libreoffice-qa Thank you for your help! -- The LibreOffice QA Team This NEW Message was generated on: 2016-04-16
** Please read this message in its entirety before responding ** To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present on a currently supported version of LibreOffice (5.2.7 or 5.3.3 https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the version of LibreOffice and your operating system, and any changes you see in the bug behavior If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a short comment that includes your version of LibreOffice and Operating System Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) http://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to "inherited from OOo"; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add "regression" to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug-20170522
It seems to work with LibreOffice V6.0 ==> V6.2 master, here are the results 123456-0001 123456-0002 123456-0003 123456-0004 123456-0005 123456-0006 123456-0007 123456-0008 Version: 6.2.0.0.alpha0+ Build ID: fd41fb8392a4e9a27d9fd09071a5f1e2be4b5a0e CPU threads: 8; OS: Linux 4.14; UI render: default; VCL: kde4; Locale: nl-BE (en_US.UTF-8); Calc: threaded But its not working with LibreOffice V5.4.8 and lower Can be closed
Nice that we can close a 6 year old bug :)