Bug 46576 - EDITING: Can'use "find and replace" function
Summary: EDITING: Can'use "find and replace" function
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 32506
Alias: None
Product: LibreOffice
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Base (show other bugs)
Version:
(earliest affected)
3.3.4 release
Hardware: All All
: medium normal
Assignee: Not Assigned
URL:
Whiteboard: BSA
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2012-02-24 07:31 UTC by xion87
Modified: 2013-09-11 19:12 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Crash report or crash signature:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description xion87 2012-02-24 07:31:33 UTC
Problem description: Can't use find and replace function by connecting a mdb (office database)

Steps to reproduce:
1. connect and open a mdb database
2. open a table, "find and replace" button is not here (add it by use customize bar)
3. The button stay grey and is not usable, tryed to select coloum or row. It do nothing

Current behavior: Can't use "find and replace" function

Expected behavior: use find and replace function

Platform (if different from the browser): Windows XP
              
Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/10.0.2
Comment 1 sasha.libreoffice 2012-05-23 09:32:41 UTC
Thanks for bugreport
Please, attach small mdb for test purposes
Comment 2 bfoman (inactive) 2012-08-01 13:30:13 UTC
Confirmed with:
LO 3.5.5.3 
Build ID: own W7 debug build
Windows 7 Professional SP1 64 bit

Button is greyed out and not usable.
Comment 3 sasha.libreoffice 2012-08-02 07:32:46 UTC
reproduced also in 3.3.4, 3.5.5, 3.6.0rc on Fedora 64 bit
using odb file
Changing version to 3.3.4 as most early reproduced
Comment 4 Robert Großkopf 2013-09-11 19:12:38 UTC
I'm just looking for old bugs. Found this description.
What do you think a "Find and Replace"-button should do in a database? It is a function, which is used in a writing-program like Writer or a calculating-program like Calc. 
This function isn't implemented yet. I think it wouldn't be implemented, because you could be a problem with foreign keys in databases.
This bug is a duplicate of
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32506
because this function doesn't exist and bug 32506 is a wish for an enhancement like this.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 32506 ***