When saving a document in multiple languages (=character sets) in RTF format, the file contains characters produced by cutting a character's Unicode value to a single byte, instead of correct value in codepage specified by font's character set.
Please could you attach an odt file which shows the problem when exported as RTF ? Best regards. JBF
Created attachment 59327 [details] Sample
Thank you, but if the problem is in the export from odt to rtf, the source file in odt format should be useful to compare source and rtf result. Best regards. JBF
Created attachment 60022 [details] screen copy in LO 3.5.3 rc0+ Here is what I see in LO 3.5.3 rc0+ (LibreOffice 3.5.3rc0+ Version ID : 51c8c95-a73d29c-6845e52-f269e46-31eca31). Is it correct ? Best regards. JBF
Created attachment 60062 [details] Screenshot of actual file content And that what software which doesn't use Unicode sees.
The problem seems to be related to a garbage charset value of 1 that somehow is recorded for some fonts. The value of DEFAULT_CHARSET is used by CreateFont function only, it is invalid for anything else.
Urmas: Do you still reproduce this with a newer version? If yes, could you attach the original file (.doc(x), odt)?
Dear Bug Submitter, Please read the entire message before proceeding. This bug has been in NEEDINFO status with no change for at least 6 months. Please provide the requested information as soon as possible and mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED. Due to regular bug tracker maintenance, if the bug is still in NEEDINFO status with no change in 30 days the QA team will close the bug as INVALID due to lack of needed information. For more information about our NEEDINFO policy please read the wiki located here: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/FDO/NEEDINFO If you have already provided the requested information, please mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED so that the QA team knows that the bug is ready to be confirmed. Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team
It seems that reporter do not want to provide the original file even if this file could allow to check if the bug is still present in current version. The actual bugdoc being corrupted (as said in the bug description), it is not useful to test the bug reproduction, only to see its effect. So closing as INVALID. Please feel free to reopen if you are willing to provide the requested informations. Best regards. JBF
Created attachment 93262 [details] Same in the doc format Of course the error is present in current version.
** Please read this message in its entirety before responding ** To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present on a currently supported version of LibreOffice (4.4.2 or later) https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the version of LibreOffice and your operating system, and any changes you see in the bug behavior If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a short comment that includes your version of LibreOffice and Operating System Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) http://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to "inherited from OOo"; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add "regression" to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=libreoffice-qa Thank you for your help! -- The LibreOffice QA Team This NEW Message was generated on: 2015-05-02
** Please read this message in its entirety before responding ** To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present on a currently supported version of LibreOffice (5.1.5 or 5.2.1 https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the version of LibreOffice and your operating system, and any changes you see in the bug behavior If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a short comment that includes your version of LibreOffice and Operating System Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) http://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to "inherited from OOo"; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add "regression" to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug-20160920
This bug was never confirmed by a third person. Could you please try to reproduce it with the latest version of LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/libreoffice-fresh/ ? I have set the bug's status to 'NEEDINFO'. Please change it back to 'UNCONFIRMED' if the bug is still present in the latest version.
Dear Bug Submitter, This bug has been in NEEDINFO status with no change for at least 6 months. Please provide the requested information as soon as possible and mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED. Due to regular bug tracker maintenance, if the bug is still in NEEDINFO status with no change in 30 days the QA team will close the bug as INSUFFICIENTDATA due to lack of needed information. For more information about our NEEDINFO policy please read the wiki located here: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/Fields/Status/NEEDINFO If you have already provided the requested information, please mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED so that the QA team knows that the bug is ready to be confirmed. Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-NeedInfo-Ping-20180129
You can't confirm your own bugs. Moving it back to UNCONFIRMED until someone else confirms it.
Created attachment 140002 [details] DOC file saved as rtf I saved attachment 93262 [details] as rtf. No idea how to determine if it's bad or not. Arch Linux 64-bit Version: 6.1.0.0.alpha0+ Build ID: c902cbc7dc5294ab721a9aef3a152aa243d00011 CPU threads: 8; OS: Linux 4.15; UI render: default; VCL: kde4; Locale: fi-FI (fi_FI.UTF-8); Calc: group Built on February 17th 2018
I do not see any difference between the text document in doc format (attachement 93262) and its RTF export done by LibreOffice 6.0.4. So I close this bug report as WorksForMe. Please feel free to reopen if you disagree. In that case, please explain precisely how to see that RTF export is faulty. Best regards. JBF