As described [here](http://user.services.openoffice.org/en/forum/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=9527), other spreadsheets allow the syntax "A:A", which means "all elements in column A".
LibreOffice doesn't support this, and I would like it to be added. The closest workaround is "A1:A65536". The problem with A1:A65536 is that the number will change if you delete rows, if you try to enter it for a graph, the range will be shrunk to fit your data to something like "A1:A35", and not expand as you add more data, etc.
Platform (if different from the browser):
Windows 7 64-bit
Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:11.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/11.0
Still doesn't work in neither
Build ID: 7122e39-92ed229-498d286-15e43b4-d70da21
on Windows 7 Home (64 bit)
Build ID: 350m1(Build:2)
on Ubuntu 12.04 (64 bit)
It is very convenient feature in Excel. So, I think it must be implemented in Calc. As well as possibility to insert such reference in formula by clicking the column or row header.
Win 7 SP1
*** Bug 71560 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
This feature would reduce a lot of questions in AskLibO. Today was another one:
Also when using not the entire column, and using the formula generator (click the fx icon), Calc should automatically make the references for the corner cell to absolute references.
There is also something more in the above link to AskLibO
As Calc doesn't support the "entire column addressing" (or "entire row") which results very inconvenience while opening spreadsheets created by other programs
for example: In a sheet created in google doc the formula =VLOOKUP(B8,Sheet1!B:D,3,0) perfectly works. But in Calc the formula returns error.
(In reply to bugquestcontri from comment #4)
> This feature would reduce a lot of questions in AskLibO. Today was another
> Also when using not the entire column, and using the formula generator
> (click the fx icon), Calc should automatically make the references for the
> corner cell to absolute references.
A "clicked reference" should either be ALWAYS relative or ALWAYS absolute. Software shouldn't pretend to know in every cas what "The User" is actually needing/wanting. One who designes a formula should feel reliable for the reference cases used.
Ceterum censeo: In other cases, in specific with regard to formulae, the same principle should be observed.
Spoke with moggi and he said this is a formula parsing problem.
The work around is to go into Tools > Options > Calc > Formula and change formula syntax from 'Calc a1' to 'Excel a1'.
(In reply to Yousuf (Jay) Philips from comment #7)
> Spoke with moggi and he said this is a formula parsing problem.
> The work around is to go into Tools > Options > Calc > Formula and change
> formula syntax from 'Calc a1' to 'Excel a1'.
Unfortunately this does not work as intended as the following will highlight:
1. In cell A2 enter the formula: =SUM(B:B)
2. Delete row 4
3. The formula in cell A2 is now incorrectly: =SUM(B$1:B$1048575)
Subsequently, this fix is required to have feature parity with other office software solutions available.
*** Bug 91819 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 44419 ***