Created attachment 61115 [details]
after upgrade to lo3.5 hyperlinks in exported pdfs are not clickable
attached zip is a testcase reproducing the issue:
* test-34.pdf generated with lo 3.4 from test.odt contains a hyperlink to included.pdf. the one works as expected when opening with acroread (the hyperlink is clickable; when clicking it opens and displays a document the hyperlink points to)
* test-35.pdf produced from lo 3.5 from test.odt in the the same environment (hardware, os). the one does not work as expected
Created attachment 79086 [details]
Export test with LibreOffice 126.96.36.199 (Win32)
Exporting the .odt file in the testcase will produce a new behaviour case in which, clicking on the link, the Internet Browser opens (showing or saving the correct file) and not the default pdf viewer, as it would be.
(In reply to comment #3)
> Exporting the .odt file in the testcase will produce a new behaviour case in
> which, clicking on the link, the Internet Browser opens (showing or saving
> the correct file) and not the default pdf viewer, as it would be.
I mean I use LibreOffice 188.8.131.52 Win32 on a Windows 8 64 bit environment, with Adobe Acrobat Reader 11.0.2, Win32.
In that environment I also confirm the correct behaviour opening test-34.pdf and the wrong one (nothing opens) from test-35.pdf.
Let me remark that hyperlinks that target to the same document (e.g. table of contents and footnotes) once worked on OpenOffice, then did not work for some releases, then worked again, and with LibreOffice I cannot remember one exported PDF that had working hyperlinks of the type I described. I'm unsure whether this is a compatibility issue with Adobe Acrobat Reader or a real bug.
The bug is still there in LibreOffice 184.108.40.206 (Linux, amd64).
(In reply to comment #6)
> The bug is still there in LibreOffice 220.127.116.11 (Linux, amd64).
And is still there in LibreOffice 4.2.4 (Build ID: 18.104.22.168-8.fc20)
uname -r: 3.14.4-200.fc20.x86_64
** Please read this message in its entirety before responding **
To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year.
There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present.
If you have time, please do the following:
Test to see if the bug is still present on a currently supported version of LibreOffice (4.4.3 or later)
If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the version of LibreOffice and your operating system, and any changes you see in the bug behavior
If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a short comment that includes your version of LibreOffice and Operating System
Please DO NOT
Update the version field
Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker)
Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case)
If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3)
2. Test your bug
3. Leave a comment with your results;
4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to "inherited from OOo";
4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add "regression" to keyword
Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=libreoffice-qa
Thank you for your help!
-- The LibreOffice QA Team This NEW Message was generated on: 2015-06-08
The bug is still here (22.214.171.124, linux x86_64)
On pc Debian x86-64 with LO Debian package 5.1.3, I don't reproduce this.
Could you give an update with this version (last stable one)?
Dear Bug Submitter,
This bug has been in NEEDINFO status with no change for at least
6 months. Please provide the requested information as soon as
possible and mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED. Due to regular bug
tracker maintenance, if the bug is still in NEEDINFO status with
no change in 30 days the QA team will close the bug as INSUFFICIENTDATA
due to lack of needed information.
For more information about our NEEDINFO policy please read the
wiki located here:
If you have already provided the requested information, please
mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED so that the QA team knows that the
bug is ready to be confirmed.
Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone!
(In reply to QA Administrators from comment #11)
> Dear Bug Submitter,
> This bug has been in NEEDINFO status with no change for at least
> 6 months. Please provide the requested information as soon as
Yes, a few months went by since LibreOffice 3.5.3 ;-)
> possible and mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED. Due to regular bug
> tracker maintenance, if the bug is still in NEEDINFO status with
> no change in 30 days the QA team will close the bug as INSUFFICIENTDATA
> due to lack of needed information.
Trying LO 5.2.3, the bug is no longer present.
(In reply to Ulrich Windl from comment #12)
> Trying LO 5.2.3, the bug is no longer present.
Let's put this one to WFM then.
Victor: don't hesitate to reopen this tracker if you still reproduce this with last stable LO version (5.2.3)