Problem description: Steps to reproduce: 1. Conditional Formatting 2. "Cell value is" "Between" "01.01.2012" and "10.10.2012" 3. Save and reopen the file Current behavior: Conditional Formatting is spoiled. No such problem with the older versions. LibreOffice 3.6; Windows XP
Problem is already fixed in 3.6.1 Please test with 3.6.1.2 and reopen if not fixed there.
Unfortunatelly, it doesn't work in 3.6.1.2 as well. Besides Conditional Formating with "Between" dates doesn't work at all in this version.
Created attachment 66121 [details] File show the bug for Between in conditonal formatting.
(In reply to comment #3) > Created attachment 66121 [details] > File show the bug for Between in conditonal formatting. Win7x64-LibreO-3.6.1.2 With dates Between never satisfy the condition. Not Between always satisfy the condition.
Date format syntax: '01.08.2012' after save and reopen becomes: "1,080,2012" Date format syntax: '1/8/2012' is ok
Indeed, I reproduce the problem for dates with LO 3.6.2.2 under Ubuntu 11.10 with FR localization. I did tests with French dates formats (10/08/2012) and ISO format (2012-08-10). Neither one nor the other works. No problem with numbers. Modified summary accordingly. Best regards. JBF
Please never reopen a fixed bug report for a different problem. And please redo all the changes and close this bug report again and open anew one. The original problem is fixed and you are now misusung this bug report for another problem that is not related with the first one. This might not be obvious but as soon as you noticed that the original bug description is fixed you should never reopen a bug report. The right solution is to open a new one with a new description and put the developer who fixed the bug report into cc. Reopening a fixed bug and misusing it for a different bug report only creates problems and distracts developers and makes it harder to keep record of fixed bug and all references in the source code to this bug report are now more or less becoming useless.
Hi Markus, You are right. This bug report is a duplicate of bug 53010. Best regards. JBF *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 53010 ***
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 54077 ***
I think it makes more sense right now to track it as duplicate of Bug 54007. The other problem is already fixed but as Rainer mentioned dates in conditional formats never really worked and I can imagine why but this is then not a regression in 3.6