Steps to Reproduce 1) Enter the appropriate data. 2) [Data]-[Sort] Click. 3) [Sort] Dialog is displayed, the part that specifies the sort key is hidden 4) Click [Options] tab. 5) Click on the [Sort Criteria] tab. 6) [sort] dialog is displayed correctly. OS:Ubuntu 12.04
Please attach a document & an image displaying the problem. Marking as NEEDINFO. After you attach these documents please reopen the bug as UNCONFIRMED. Thanks for your patience and help
Created attachment 73545 [details] sample document very simple sample document
Created attachment 73546 [details] Screenshot
(In reply to comment #1) > Please attach a document & an image displaying the problem. > > Marking as NEEDINFO. > > After you attach these documents please reopen the bug as UNCONFIRMED. > Thanks for your patience and help I thank your advice. I uploaded attach files. To display the [Sort] dialog, and move the dialog that is then displayed correctly. Is this a problem of my hardware?
I have same problem in 4.0RC1 (Build ID: 527dba6f6e0cfbbc71bd6e7b88a52699bb48799) in Ubuntu 12.10: $ cat /etc/lsb-release DISTRIB_ID=Ubuntu DISTRIB_RELEASE=12.10 DISTRIB_CODENAME=quantal DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION="Ubuntu 12.10" $ uname -a uname -a Linux <my hostname> 3.5.0-22-generic #34-Ubuntu SMP Tue Jan 8 21:41:11 UTC 2013 i686 i686 i686 GNU/Linux To recover incorrect displayed dialog, we need to send redraw event; switching tabs, moving dialog or in my case, press [ALT] key.
I can't reproduce this using Linux Mint 14 x64 with LO 4.0.0.2 rc2 and latest master Version 4.1.0.0.alpha0+ (Build ID: f1bca26afcc7593d0124c216c0400a9e2e47fc1)
This problem has not been reproduced in 4.0rc2. Thanks.
As I mentioned above, I had a same problem with RC1, but with RC2 it seems fine. Several people in Japanese community also reported same result. So this Bug could be closed.
(In reply to comment #8) > As I mentioned above, I had a same problem with RC1, but with RC2 it seems > fine. > Several people in Japanese community also reported same result. > So this Bug could be closed. Thank you very much for this info. Therefore I mark it as RESOLVED WORKSFORME. Kind regards, Joren