Ubuntu 12.04.1 LO 3.5.4.2 When exporting a document in Writer to (X)HTML, the resulting document contains the following comment: <!--This file was converted to xhtml by OpenOffice.org - see http://xml.openoffice.org/odf2xhtml for more info.--> The file also contains the tag: <meta name="DCTERMS.source" content="http://xml.openoffice.org/odf2xhtml"/> --- 1. The file was converted to xhtml by LibreOffice, not OpenOffice.org. 2. The DCTERMS.source file should be hosted on a LibreOffice website or on a website controlled by a standards organization.
Testing in 4.0.0.3 (Ubuntu 12.04), When exporting to xhtml, the comment now reads: --- <!--This file was converted to xhtml by LibreOffice - see http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/tree/filter/source/xslt for the code.--> --- The file still contains the meta tag: <meta name="DCTERMS.source" content="http://xml.openoffice.org/odf2xhtml"/> I'd still like some confirmation on whether the DCTERMS.source url should point to a resource under the aegis of LibreOffice/TDF.
Hello Qubit, I reproduce with LO 4.0.2.2 & Windows 7 Home Premium. Sure, if the first tag can change, why not the second one? Have a nice day, Jacques Guilleron
** Please read this message in its entirety before responding ** To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present on a currently supported version of LibreOffice (4.4.1 or later) https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the version of LibreOffice and your operating system, and any changes you see in the bug behavior If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a short comment that includes your version of LibreOffice and Operating System Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) http://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to "inherited from OOo"; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add "regression" to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=libreoffice-qa Thank you for your help! -- The LibreOffice QA Team This NEW Message was generated on: 2015-03-16
UPDATE: TESTING with master build from today on Ubuntu 14.04: LO Version: 4.5.0.0.alpha0+ Build ID: bdad6d0fe492a2334cb27ef54fc5d1cba17d1970 TinderBox: Linux-rpm_deb-x86_64@46-TDF, Branch:master, Time: 2015-03-19_00:36:37 Locale: en_US (In reply to Robinson Tryon (qubit) from comment #1) REPRO Steps: 1) Open Writer 2) Export file as XHTML > When exporting to xhtml, the comment now reads: > > --- > <!--This file was converted to xhtml by LibreOffice - see > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/tree/filter/source/xslt for the > code.--> > --- Same comment in file export here. > > The file still contains the meta tag: > > <meta name="DCTERMS.source" content="http://xml.openoffice.org/odf2xhtml"/> > Yes -- the tag remains: <meta name="DCTERMS.source" content="http://xml.openoffice.org/odf2xhtml"/>
** Please read this message in its entirety before responding ** To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present on a currently supported version of LibreOffice (5.0.5 or 5.1.2 https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the version of LibreOffice and your operating system, and any changes you see in the bug behavior If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a short comment that includes your version of LibreOffice and Operating System Please DO NOT - Update the version field - Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) - Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) http://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to "inherited from OOo"; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add "regression" to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=libreoffice-qa Thank you for your help! -- The LibreOffice QA Team This NEW Message was generated on: 2016-04-16
The quotations are from http://opengrok.libreoffice.org/xref/core/filter/source/xslt/ common/measure_conversion.xsl:20: For further documentation and updates visit http://xml.openoffice.org/odf2xhtml export/common/body.xsl:20: For further documentation and updates visit http://xml.openoffice.org/odf2xhtml export/common/styles/style_mapping_css.xsl:20: For further documentation and updates visit http://xml.openoffice.org/odf2xhtml export/common/styles/style_collector.xsl:20: For further documentation and updates visit http://xml.openoffice.org/odf2xhtml export/common/table/table_columns.xsl:20: For further documentation and updates visit http://xml.openoffice.org/odf2xhtml export/common/table/table.xsl:20: For further documentation and updates visit http://xml.openoffice.org/odf2xhtml export/common/table/table_rows.xsl:20: For further documentation and updates visit http://xml.openoffice.org/odf2xhtml export/common/table/table_cells.xsl:20: For further documentation and updates visit http://xml.openoffice.org/odf2xhtml export/common/table_of_content.xsl:20: For further documentation and updates visit http://xml.openoffice.org/odf2xhtml export/xhtml/body.xsl:20: For further documentation and updates visit http://xml.openoffice.org/odf2xhtml export/xhtml/table.xsl:20: For further documentation and updates visit http://xml.openoffice.org/odf2xhtml export/xhtml/header.xsl:20: For further documentation and updates visit http://xml.openoffice.org/odf2xhtml export/xhtml/header.xsl:327: <xsl:attribute name="content">http://xml.openoffice.org/odf2xhtml</xsl:attribute> export/xhtml/header.xsl:403: <link rel="transformation" href="http://xml.openoffice.org/odf2xhtml/rdf-extract.xsl" /> export/xhtml/opendoc2xhtml.xsl:20: For further documentation and updates visit http://xml.openoffice.org/odf2xhtml But what to put instead since there's no equivalent page on LO?
** Please read this message in its entirety before responding ** To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from http://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo'; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: https://kiwiirc.com/nextclient/irc.freenode.net/#libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug
Dear Robinson Tryon (qubit), To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo'; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: https://kiwiirc.com/nextclient/irc.freenode.net/#libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug
The first part (about "converted by OpenOffice.org") is indeed fixed, but I am not sure the second part should be fixed if the filter in use is officially documented by that OpenOffice.org page. Did LibreOffice make any change to the filter? And if so, where is its documentation hosted? Version: 7.2.0.0.alpha0+ / LibreOffice Community Build ID: 6b09276d157abada74e1a4989700139167207778 CPU threads: 8; OS: Linux 4.15; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3 Locale: en-AU (en_AU.UTF-8); UI: en-US TinderBox: Linux-rpm_deb-x86_64@86-TDF, Branch:master, Time: 2021-05-14_04:32:30 Calc: threaded
Dear Robinson Tryon (qubit), This bug has been in NEEDINFO status with no change for at least 6 months. Please provide the requested information as soon as possible and mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED. Due to regular bug tracker maintenance, if the bug is still in NEEDINFO status with no change in 30 days the QA team will close the bug as INSUFFICIENTDATA due to lack of needed information. For more information about our NEEDINFO policy please read the wiki located here: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/Fields/Status/NEEDINFO If you have already provided the requested information, please mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED so that the QA team knows that the bug is ready to be confirmed. Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-NeedInfo-Ping
Dear Robinson Tryon (qubit), Please read this message in its entirety before proceeding. Your bug report is being closed as INSUFFICIENTDATA due to inactivity and a lack of information which is needed in order to accurately reproduce and confirm the problem. We encourage you to retest your bug against the latest release. If the issue is still present in the latest stable release, we need the following information (please ignore any that you've already provided): a) Provide details of your system including your operating system and the latest version of LibreOffice that you have confirmed the bug to be present b) Provide easy to reproduce steps – the simpler the better c) Provide any test case(s) which will help us confirm the problem d) Provide screenshots of the problem if you think it might help e) Read all comments and provide any requested information Once all of this is done, please set the bug back to UNCONFIRMED and we will attempt to reproduce the issue. Please do not: a) respond via email b) update the version field in the bug or any of the other details on the top section of our bug tracker Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-NeedInfo-FollowUp