Created attachment 83697 [details]
Chinese proportional font missing in 220.127.116.11 Writer
Upon upgrading from 18.104.22.168 to 22.214.171.124, those Chinese proportional fonts are missing from the font selection pull-down menus, and texts in old documents using those fonts are not rendered correctly.
Some Chinese fonts are provided in both monospaced and proportional variants in one .ttc file.
In my case, the font in questions are the DFHeiLight-B5 "華康細黑體" and the DFPHeiLight-B5 "華康細黑體(P)", where the "(P)" denotes the proportional variant.
On the left-hand side of the screenshot (126.96.36.199), both monospaced (without "(P)" in the font name) and proportional (with "(P)" in font name) variants are available together.
On the right-hand side (188.8.131.52), the proportional variant is missing, and the selected font name is shown in italics, meaning it is missing and being substituted.
Fixed screenshot: http://i.imgur.com/xDmmWKn.png
Same problem here with Microsoft's Meiryo fonts, which are distributed in .ttc (true type collection)
I thought that the support of ttcfonts has been trashed, but Cambria & Cambria Math (included in cambria.ttc) both show, as well as most Japanese .ttc.
The problem seems fixed in 184.108.40.206.
(In reply to Selwyn Tang from comment #3)
Please confirm whether this issue still exists in the latest version (220.127.116.11 or the test version 18.104.22.168).
If it works, please mark as RESOLVED WORKSFORME. Otherwise, set back to NEW.
Dear Bug Submitter,
This bug has been in NEEDINFO status with no change for at least 6 months. Please provide the requested information as soon as possible and mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED. Due to regular bug tracker maintenance, if the bug is still in NEEDINFO status with no change in 30 days the QA team will close the bug as INVALID due to lack of needed information.
For more information about our NEEDINFO policy please read the wiki located here:
If you have already provided the requested information, please mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED so that the QA team knows that the bug is ready to be confirmed.
Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone!
This NEEDINFO message was generated on: 2015-07-18
It's fixed since at least 22.214.171.124. Thanks!