Created attachment 84062 [details] Simple file with autofilter enabled, for your convenience (Derived from Bug 57431) Steps to reproduce 1. Open any spreadsheet document, create AutoFilter on some data (see attached file for example). 2. In any column, open AutoFilter pop-up window and select "Not empty". 3. Open AutoFilter pop-up window again on this column. Result All checkboxes (by values and "All") are unchecked. Expected result Since all values are visible, one might expect these checkboxes to be checked. Reproduced under Debian testing, amd64. LO 4.0.4 from Debian repository and 3.6.6 and 4.1.0, both from TDF website. Therefore, starting with NEW.
Reproduced under Vista-32b: Version 4.0.5.2 (Build ID: 5464147a081647a250913f19c0715bca595af2f) Version: 4.1.0.4 Build ID: 89ea49ddacd9aa532507cbf852f2bb22b1ace28
I my opinion, this is the same issue as in Bug 65505 - FILTER: Auto filter checkbox missing for "empty" cells. When you click "Not Empty", Calc is filtering out only the values "Not Empty", thus uncheck all others. "Not Empty" here has the same effect as a checkbox. The "Not Empty" botton should be converted to a checkbox (as requested in bug 65505) in order to avoid many confusion. Can this bug be marked as a duplicate of bug 65505? (I am adding SEE ALSO at this moment.
Yes, if all these bugs are rolled into one, this should be included - it is impossible to visually represent "Not empty" without implementing an "empty" checkbox.
Well, I suppose technically you could have "All" checked with a "-" instead of a tick (Maybe some platforms tick in grey rather than with a "-"), and everything else ticked with a tick. But this isn't transparent - most users probably wouldn't realise what it meant.
** Please read this message in its entirety before responding ** To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present on a currently supported version of LibreOffice (5.0.4 or later) https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the version of LibreOffice and your operating system, and any changes you see in the bug behavior the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a short comment that includes your version of LibreOffice and Operating System Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) http://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to "inherited from OOo"; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add "regression" to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=libreoffice-qa Thank you for your help! -- The LibreOffice QA Team This NEW Message was generated on: 2015-12-20
** Please read this message in its entirety before responding ** To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present on a currently supported version of LibreOffice (5.1.6 or 5.2.3 https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the version of LibreOffice and your operating system, and any changes you see in the bug behavior If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a short comment that includes your version of LibreOffice and Operating System Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) http://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to "inherited from OOo"; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add "regression" to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug-20170103
still repro in Версия: 6.3.0.0.alpha0+ ID сборки: 51af3179cf972809d6495c7d58033e069f647bbf Потоков ЦП: 4; ОС:Linux 4.18; Отрисовка ИП: по умолчанию; VCL: kde5; TinderBox: Linux-rpm_deb-x86_64@86-TDF, Branch:master, Time: 2019-02-01_00:15:00 Локаль: ru-RU (ru_RU.UTF-8); UI-Language: ru-RU Calc: threaded
funny, it looks as if the checkbox for 'empty' (c#2) is recently added, if you click 'not empty' correctly all non empty values are displayed and the rows with empty cell in that column are hidden, ... but ... if you re-open the filter popup all checkboxes for all values are unchecked??, except that for 'empty', that's checked!!! upside-down world? wrong 'code reuse'??? ver. 7.1.0.0.a0+ 2020-10-04, tested without defined range, one column, range manually selected to not to stop at empty cell,
Balazs Varga committed a patch related to this issue. It has been pushed to "master": https://git.libreoffice.org/core/commit/00e13be1c3dd45597237f805a06b3e8a74187125 tdf#68113 sc autofilter: fix not empty button unchecks all entries It will be available in 7.2.0. The patch should be included in the daily builds available at https://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/ in the next 24-48 hours. More information about daily builds can be found at: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Testing_Daily_Builds Affected users are encouraged to test the fix and report feedback.
Balazs Varga committed a patch related to this issue. It has been pushed to "master": https://git.libreoffice.org/core/commit/e8bba8229080f873b89b39551e924d1c8609fc07 Related tdf#68113 sc autofilter: clean-up for It will be available in 7.2.0. The patch should be included in the daily builds available at https://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/ in the next 24-48 hours. More information about daily builds can be found at: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Testing_Daily_Builds Affected users are encouraged to test the fix and report feedback.
Thanks for fixing this, a very old bug. It's ok now in Version: 7.2.0.0.alpha1+ / LibreOffice Community Build ID: f49e5902a3737c02fabf5bec23243ccb126426c4 CPU threads: 4; OS: Linux 5.8; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3 Locale: ro-RO (ro_RO.UTF-8); UI: en-US Calc: threaded