Please update TDF site pre-release (4.1.4 is stable) http://www.libreoffice.org/download/pre-releases/ Wrong: "LibreOffice 4.1.4 RC2 (2013-12-12) Below, you can download the second release candidate of the upcoming 4.1.4 for evaluation, QA testing, etc. You are not recommended to use LibreOffice pre-release builds for "mission-critical" purposes. For more information about QA testing, please visit the QA testers page. Please always read the Releases Notes. If you're interested in even more bleeding-edge binaries of our current development, check out our nightly builds - those are potentially even less suitable for productive work, provided by individual contributors, and not QA-approved in any way. Caveat emptor."
confirmed.
still present. moreover now a 4.1.5 RC1 download should be offered instead of 4.1.4 RC2
FIXED. web-page has been update and shows correct build number.
the release notes for 4.1.5 RC1 are not published in the wiki so they can't be accessed from the pre-release page: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Releases/4.1.5/RC1
@João Mac-Cormick you are right. 4.1.5 RC1 notes page is empty https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan/4.1#4.1.5_release morevoer 4.2.0 RC4 is not yet listed. https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan/4.2#4.2.0_release RC4 was an "overtime" releases that became 4.2.0 final @Joel Madero who is charge for those wiki pages? by the way Cloph is already aware of the 4.2.0 RC4 thing
ok. both issues fixed now.
now https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Releases/4.2.0/RC4 exists, but the link to RC4 in https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan/4.2#4.2.0_release is incorrect as it points to RC3
thx. Fixed. PS: It's a wiki :-))
Just to clarify what that means - a wiki can be edited by anyone - so if you see a mistake like that feel free to update it :) No need to get our experts involved :)
(In reply to comment #9) > Just to clarify what that means - a wiki can be edited by anyone - so if you > see a mistake like that feel free to update it :) No need to get our experts > involved :) Just to clarify the topic. The original report is on the TDF web page and not the wiki.