With the recent addition of an icon to the custom color picker button, it would be good to have a few more pixels between the icon and label. 2 or 3 pixels would do. How it looks - attachment 108607 [details]
Yes needed...
I know... I had set the standard 6 pixels of padding, but for some reason that value is ignored.
Created attachment 115650 [details] screenshot LibO 5.0 alpha looks better in 5.0 (see screenshot) tested under Win8x64 using 5.0.0.0.alpha1+ Build ID: 4048311aae6993357c2d0be1f1968a8c57dd4e85 TinderBox: Win-x86@42, Branch:master, Time: 2015-05-08_23:52:08 Locale: en-US (it_IT) should we mark this as RESOLVED WORSFORME?
I dont see any difference in your screenshot tommy from mine.
we are talking about different parts of the screenshots. you refer to the space between the icon and the text label, while I was talking about the space below the text label. my fault, I misunderstood you bug report
** Please read this message in its entirety before responding ** To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present on a currently supported version of LibreOffice (5.1.5 or 5.2.1 https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the version of LibreOffice and your operating system, and any changes you see in the bug behavior If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a short comment that includes your version of LibreOffice and Operating System Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) http://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to "inherited from OOo"; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add "regression" to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug-20160920
Is this still relevant? I don't see any issue.
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #7) > Is this still relevant? I don't see any issue. Yes still to close in my view.
** Please read this message in its entirety before responding ** To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from http://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo'; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: https://kiwiirc.com/nextclient/irc.freenode.net/#libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug
retested in 6.1.0.0.alpha0+ Build ID: e0a94ded5d1635fa2a2d9e222bfcfa0a2289a01f CPU threads: 4; OS: Windows 6.3; UI render: default; TinderBox: Win-x86@42, Branch:master, Time: 2018-02-08_23:36:06 Locale: it-IT (it_IT); Calc: group in my previous screenshot from 5.0 alpha there were 3 pixels between the right margin of the icon and the left margin of the "C" of "custom color" label. now I count 4 pixels. may we mark this as resolved WFM?
(In reply to tommy27 from comment #10) > now I count 4 pixels. Yes i see the 4 pixels now, likely due to the font rendering by harfbuzz, but it still needs a few more pixels in my view. Maxim: Is this something doable in glade as i wasnt able to find anything?
On Windows builds of 6.2.1 and of current master/6.3.0alpha0+ counting a full 6px spacing between the icon and the label. Adolfo's padding per comment 2 seems to be asserting.