LibreOffice cannot properly open or extract documents embedded within a .doc(x) container when they should be open by another program than LibreOffice. A good example is to try to open (or export) the .zip / .pdf attachments from this document http://cept.org/Documents/ecc-pt1/14999/ECC-PT1(14)014_rev1_Results-of-Public-Consultation-of-the-draft-amended-ECCDEC(11)06
Which specific issue do you mean? Do you mean the layout of the doc/docx documents is wrong? Or do you only mean that the pdf/zip documents are not opened? For me the pdf document is opened in the pdf reader as expected. (tested with LO 4.3.3.2, Win 8.1)
I'm using Linux (XUbuntu 14.04 in my case, but I could reproduce the issue on other distributions). The issue is that the pdf/zip documents are not opened (double-clicking on the item does not open any external program to open the file, and there is no submenu entry in LibreOffice that would allow to 'extract/export' the embedded file in order to open it manually)
Thank you very much for your fast reply. I can open the pdf document with a pdf reader. Maybe, this is a Linux only issue? Can anybody else confirm this bug?
Setting, NEW and All but really only seeing issues with the Zip OLE objects. On Windows 7 sp1, 64-bit en-US with Version: 4.3.3.2 Build ID: 9bb7eadab57b6755b1265afa86e04bf45fbfc644 or with a current build of Master The OLE stream for the linked Word .DOC(s) will open with Writer, and the PDF actually does open with the associated helper file--can change helper from Adobe Reader to GSView. Also, the .ZIP archive OLE objects are being extracted on document open into the users env variable defined TMP directory. But, while the Zip archives are available to manipulate with an archive or folder manager, they are not being opened from within the LibreOffice session. Instead a double click on the OLE object's frame launches a dialog "Create Package" which looks to belong to the MS Object Packager2 packager.dll.mui, so that seems like a command name collision with the LibreOffice package2 module--http://opengrok.libreoffice.org/xref/core/package/util/package2.component =-= On a Linux--Fedora 20 32-bit LXDE and LO 4.2.6.3 the PCManFM file manager does not seem to correctly associate a file type with the OLE stream held as .tmp files written to user /tmp for the Writer session. The Word .DOCs can be opened within the Writer session. And the PDF files can be opened out of the /tmp .tmp file with Evince--but not by a double click in Writer. But the OLE stream for the .Zip file is not recognized. =-= Get the feeling that handling of the OLE embedded or linked objects is very dependent on the mix of OS, DE and configured file management for each type. Would lean toward this being an enhancement of some sort. I'm just not that up on what should and shouldn't work.
Screen Shot 2015-01-19 at 1.31.43 PM.png Keep getting this message when trying to open downloaded templates. I've uninstalled Java 8, reinstalled the same, quit the browser (Safari), quit LibreOffice, restarted everything, and still get the same error when I know the download and installation were done according to instuctions.
This used to work *slightly* better - the result I get on Linux for e.g. "Annex 2" is that before (1), somehow Firefox gets invoked and offers to save a temporary file which LO has exported, though I don't seem to have anything able to open the result. (Is this really a Visio file? among the output from master when trying to open the object is "VisioDocument: version 0") Between (1) and (2) we get a Writer window displaying binary rubbish. After (2) we get the current result - i.e. double clicking doesn't visibly achieve anything. Adding Cc: to mstahl@redhat.com, tml@iki.fi; Any further ideas about what's going on here? (1) commit e62339f856efa0b8ef03df3bf8b93e098c4ac0d3 Author: Michael Stahl <mstahl@redhat.com> Date: Mon Feb 10 16:45:27 2014 +0100 fdo#73363: sd: fix mis-detection of Visio files as PPT SdFilterDetect::detect() erroneously detects all binary MSO files, and because the Visio types would be checked after PPT, Visio is pre-empted. Change-Id: I6ec3647a508dc8d79b47bfff6de35ccae39416ee (2) commit 46ad54725bf28ea75278eb63dbf95c4a29618c1c Author: Tor Lillqvist <tml@collabora.com> AuthorDate: Wed Aug 27 14:29:43 2014 +0300 Commit: Tor Lillqvist <tml@collabora.com> CommitDate: Wed Aug 27 15:08:58 2014 +0300 bnc#648251: Avoid crash when attempting to open embedded OLE object as "text" On non-Windows, when double-clicking an embedded OLE object, our glorious content type detection logic detects it as "Text". As a side-effect, we start to calculate text statistics on it. Which surely could produce interesting numbers (you know what they say about statistics), but sadly causes a crash involving the ICU RuleBasedBreakIterator, SwScanner, sw::DocumentStatisticsManager and whatnot. Avoid this by checking for a detected filter of type "Text" explicitly, and avoiding the fun code paths in that case. This leads to double-clicks being just ignored. Maybe it would be more useful to produce a "General OLE Error" message box? Change-Id: Iae0726b5e9c511a92bdff7229d2978cbf76cb07b
(In reply to Matthew Francis from comment #6) > This used to work *slightly* better - the result I get on Linux for e.g. > "Annex 2" is that before (1), somehow Firefox gets invoked and offers to > save a temporary file which LO has exported, though I don't seem to have > anything able to open the result. > (Is this really a Visio file? among the output from master when trying to > open the object is "VisioDocument: version 0") Just to be sure I do not misunderstand : does your question "is this really a visio file" apply to my example "http://cept.org/Documents/ecc-pt1/14999/ECC-PT1(14)014_rev1_Results-of-Public-Consultation-of-the-draft-amended-ECCDEC(11)06" ? Annex 2 is a ZIP file i.e. not a Visio file. There is no Visio file attached in this document (only MS-word, PDF and ZIP. For example Annex 1 is MS-Word, Annex 4 is PDF). N.B. If it is a too big work to handle those OLE-embedded documents on Linux, maybe at least it would be easy to implement a right-click menu entry "extract this embedded file" so that it can be extracted and then opened manually ? > Between (1) and (2) we get a Writer window displaying binary rubbish. > After (2) we get the current result - i.e. double clicking doesn't visibly > achieve anything. > > Adding Cc: to mstahl@redhat.com, tml@iki.fi; Any further ideas about what's > going on here? > > > (1) > commit e62339f856efa0b8ef03df3bf8b93e098c4ac0d3 > Author: Michael Stahl <mstahl@redhat.com> > Date: Mon Feb 10 16:45:27 2014 +0100 > > fdo#73363: sd: fix mis-detection of Visio files as PPT > > SdFilterDetect::detect() erroneously detects all binary MSO files, > and > because the Visio types would be checked after PPT, Visio is > pre-empted. > > Change-Id: I6ec3647a508dc8d79b47bfff6de35ccae39416ee > > (2) > commit 46ad54725bf28ea75278eb63dbf95c4a29618c1c > Author: Tor Lillqvist <tml@collabora.com> > AuthorDate: Wed Aug 27 14:29:43 2014 +0300 > Commit: Tor Lillqvist <tml@collabora.com> > CommitDate: Wed Aug 27 15:08:58 2014 +0300 > > bnc#648251: Avoid crash when attempting to open embedded OLE object > as "text" > > On non-Windows, when double-clicking an embedded OLE object, our > glorious > content type detection logic detects it as "Text". As a side-effect, > we start > to calculate text statistics on it. Which surely could produce > interesting > numbers (you know what they say about statistics), but sadly causes > a crash > involving the ICU RuleBasedBreakIterator, SwScanner, > sw::DocumentStatisticsManager and whatnot. > > Avoid this by checking for a detected filter of type "Text" > explicitly, and > avoiding the fun code paths in that case. > > This leads to double-clicks being just ignored. Maybe it would be > more useful > to produce a "General OLE Error" message box? > > Change-Id: Iae0726b5e9c511a92bdff7229d2978cbf76cb07b
Migrating Whiteboard tags to Keywords: (bibisected) [NinjaEdit]
** Please read this message in its entirety before responding ** To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present on a currently supported version of LibreOffice (5.4.1 or 5.3.6 https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the version of LibreOffice and your operating system, and any changes you see in the bug behavior If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a short comment that includes your version of LibreOffice and Operating System Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) http://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to "inherited from OOo"; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add "regression" to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug-20170929
Dear Adrien Demarez, To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from http://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo'; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: https://kiwiirc.com/nextclient/irc.freenode.net/#libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug
Dear all, I tested recently on Linux KUbuntu 20.04 + Libreoffice 6.0.7.3 and on Manjaro/XFCE + Libreoffice 7.0.1.2, and for both cases the bug seems resolved (I don't know when it was fixed and I didn't test with any previous version or distribution. I also cannot test on MacOS as I no longer have access to a Mac). Thanks !