Bug 88927 - Trusted timestamping for digital signature
Summary: Trusted timestamping for digital signature
Status: REOPENED
Alias: None
Product: LibreOffice
Classification: Unclassified
Component: LibreOffice (show other bugs)
Version:
(earliest affected)
unspecified
Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64) All
: medium normal
Assignee: Not Assigned
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks: Digital-Signatures
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2015-01-30 08:21 UTC by Yan Fiz
Modified: 2017-01-30 07:42 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Crash report or crash signature:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Yan Fiz 2015-01-30 08:21:43 UTC
Will trusted timestamping feature be added for both LibreOffice files and PDF files to protect files for lifetime in the future versions of LibreOffice?
Comment 1 bfoman (inactive) 2015-02-02 17:13:08 UTC
RESOLVED DUPLICATE of tracker bug 84881.
You can still make a donation.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 84881 ***
Comment 2 Yan Fiz 2015-02-05 09:31:28 UTC
This is not exact duplicate of bug 84881. Because I meant for both OpenDocument and PDF files, not just PDF files.
Comment 3 bfoman (inactive) 2015-02-05 19:36:36 UTC
(In reply to Yan Fiz from comment #2)
> This is not exact duplicate of bug 84881. Because I meant for both
> OpenDocument and PDF files, not just PDF files.

Well, the best is to split such requests as PDF and OpenDocuments are different formats and need separate work, commits and such. Having one bug for all is not a good idea. Instead of reopening this one, I would file new bugs for OpenDocuments only. Just my 2 cents.
Comment 4 Markus Wernig 2015-03-01 13:55:22 UTC
Well, before this can be worked on, I suppose there needs to be a specification for timestamps in ODF documents.
As far as I am aware, there is no notion of digitally signed (RFC 3161) timestamps in the format, right?
So a first step would be to draw up a specification.

And, yes, this should then go into a separate "bug" (i.e. feature request)