Bug 89567 - Crash in Report Design View when adding text box with IF conditional
Summary: Crash in Report Design View when adding text box with IF conditional
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 89643
Alias: None
Product: LibreOffice
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Base (show other bugs)
Version:
(earliest affected)
4.4.0.3 release
Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64) Linux (All)
: high critical
Assignee: Not Assigned
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2015-02-22 15:59 UTC by Jörn Nettingsmeier
Modified: 2015-03-21 07:57 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Crash report or crash signature:


Attachments
log file with backtrace for crash with production database (split db) (158.69 KB, text/x-log)
2015-02-22 15:59 UTC, Jörn Nettingsmeier
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Jörn Nettingsmeier 2015-02-22 15:59:04 UTC
Created attachment 113606 [details]
log file with backtrace for crash with production database (split db)

Create a minimal database project, single table, no relations.
Create a report with the wizard, select all fields, take default choices ("next, next,..."), then modify report in design view.
Add text box. Select Field/Formula, click on "..." to bring up the Formula window.
Start typing "=IF(".
At this point, Libreoffice crashes reproducibly.
I was able to reproduce this with openJDK 1.7.0 and 1.9.0, both with a split database and embedded db.
Comment 1 Jörn Nettingsmeier 2015-02-22 16:05:24 UTC
Inserting the IF() expression by double-clicking into the formula side panel produces the same crash.
Comment 2 raal 2015-02-22 16:23:35 UTC
(In reply to Jörn Nettingsmeier from comment #1)
> Inserting the IF() expression by double-clicking into the formula side panel
> produces the same crash.

I can confirm crash with Version: 4.5.0.0.alpha0+
Build ID: 52b25c1adf3a70819aea2080b0ad50a14a3c104b
TinderBox: Linux-rpm_deb-x86_64@46-TDF, Branch:master, Time: 2015-02-17_03:10:47
Comment 3 Julien Nabet 2015-03-21 07:57:34 UTC
Let's put this one as the dup since tdf#89643 is more generic and has more comments.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 89643 ***