Bug 90398 - Filter on Calc by increasing order
Summary: Filter on Calc by increasing order
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 86968
Alias: None
Product: LibreOffice
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Calc (show other bugs)
Version:
(earliest affected)
4.3.6.2 release
Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64) Windows (All)
: high major
Assignee: Not Assigned
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2015-04-01 14:43 UTC by Daniele
Modified: 2016-04-19 09:32 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Crash report or crash signature:

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Daniele 2015-04-01 14:43:51 UTC 
When you try to apply the automatic filter on the first line of a Calc sheet by increasing order of a column the first line when filtered is moved at the end of the document. Sorry for may english if you can nor understand.
Comment 1 raal 2015-04-01 18:05:51 UTC 
Hello Daniele,

Thank you for reporting the bug. Can you see if bug 86968 is similar to your problem so that I can mark your report as a duplicate of it? (Later bugs are generally marked as duplicates of earlier bugs).
Comment 2 QA Administrators 2015-10-14 19:51:19 UTC 
Dear Bug Submitter,

This bug has been in NEEDINFO status with no change for at least 6 months. Please provide the requested information as soon as possible and mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED. Due to regular bug tracker maintenance, if the bug is still in NEEDINFO status with no change in 30 days the QA team will close the bug as INVALID due to lack of needed information.

For more information about our NEEDINFO policy please read the wiki located here: 
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/FDO/NEEDINFO

If you have already provided the requested information, please mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED so that the QA team knows that the bug is ready to be confirmed.


Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone!


Warm Regards,
QA Team

This NEEDINFO message was generated on: 2015-10-14
Comment 3 mahfiaz 2016-04-19 09:32:42 UTC 
I believe raal found the right duplicate.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 86968 ***