Bug 91220 - Names are not sorted in Manage Names
Summary: Names are not sorted in Manage Names
Status: RESOLVED WORKSFORME
Alias: None
Product: LibreOffice
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Calc (show other bugs)
Version:
(earliest affected)
4.4.3.2 release
Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64) Linux (All)
: medium normal
Assignee: Not Assigned
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2015-05-11 13:11 UTC by rlk
Modified: 2016-05-09 17:28 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Crash report or crash signature:


Attachments
Example w/missing names in 4.4.3.2 that are present in 4.2.7.2. (109.49 KB, application/vnd.oasis.opendocument.spreadsheet)
2015-05-11 13:11 UTC, rlk
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description rlk 2015-05-11 13:11:38 UTC
Created attachment 115493 [details]
Example w/missing names in 4.4.3.2 that are present in 4.2.7.2.

In LibreOffice 4.4.3.2, the attached file has some names missing.  If you go into Insert->Names->Manage, you'll see that names al_ay, al_c, and quite a few others don't show up, although they're evidently present because the sheet works.

4.2.7.2 shows all of the names in the Manage Names dialog.

Marking Critical because no workaround, although this is likely not a very common situation because most people probably don't abuse names to the degree I do in this spreadsheet.
Comment 1 raal 2015-05-11 16:41:02 UTC
I can not confirm with Version: 5.0.0.0.alpha1+
Build ID: ceb6f473837261f2a6e43e028ce9da3daccc2f6c
TinderBox: Linux-rpm_deb-x86_64@46-TDF, Branch:master, Time: 2015-05-11_13:16:38


names al_ay, al_c are present in UI.
Comment 2 rlk 2015-05-11 17:02:28 UTC
How do I get that build to test?
Comment 3 raal 2015-05-11 17:04:32 UTC
Hello,
you can download here: http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/master/
Comment 4 rlk 2015-05-11 17:26:19 UTC
Confirm that at least those names are still present with 5.0 alpha.
Comment 5 raal 2015-05-11 18:16:05 UTC
Works also in Version: 4.4.4.0.0+
Build ID: aa2c7cb6d34de5ba673bb17d0d0d51ee08e06f8b
TinderBox: Linux-rpm_deb-x86_64@46-TDF, Branch:libreoffice-4-4, Time: 2015-05-02_19:02:44

but names are not sorted (are almost at the end of the list). Closing bug as worksforme.
Comment 6 rlk 2015-05-11 18:53:07 UTC
Unsorted names are a problem themselves; it makes it hard to view.  I'm reopening it as normal priority.  If you prefer, I could file a separate bug.
Comment 7 raal 2015-05-12 07:12:35 UTC
(In reply to rlk from comment #6)
> Unsorted names are a problem themselves; it makes it hard to view.  I'm
> reopening it as normal priority.  If you prefer, I could file a separate bug.

Hello,
I have not 5.0 build available for now, but IIRC in build 5.0 are names sorted correctly? => WFM 
If in build 5.0 are names not sorted, set to unconfirmed.
Comment 8 rlk 2015-05-12 11:49:41 UTC
It appeared to be correct in 5.0.

What about 4.5?
Comment 9 rlk 2015-05-12 13:06:47 UTC
Adding backportRequest at raal's request.
Comment 10 Michael Stahl (CIB) 2016-05-09 17:28:46 UTC
remove "backportrequest" for EOL release branch