Created attachment 117132 [details] Speadsheet with example formula for testing double click word boundaries When double clicking a cell reference inside a formula, sometimes the wrong word boundaries are used resulting in more being selected than expected. Specifically, if the cell reference is followed by numbers, the cell reference and the numbers end up being selected, instead of just the cell reference. In the spreadsheet attached, the formula =IF(A3="","",IF(LEN(A3)<=135,A3,IF(LEN(A3)<=260,LEFT(A3,SEARCH(" ",A3,125)),LEFT(A3,SEARCH(" ",A3,130))))) is used as an example. Double clicking the cell reference A3 works as expected in most cases. Double clicking the A3 cell reference in the SEARCH() functions results in "A3,125" or "A3,130" being selected instead of just A3 being selected as would be expected. As a work around, adding a space after the comma (i.e. SEARCH(" ",A3, 130)) makes double clicking work as expected. Tested using LibreOffice Calc 4.4.3 (Windows) and 4.3.7.2 (Fedora 21)
I'm asking UX for input on this one. FWIW - same behavior in 3.3 so setting the version to "inherited from OOo" Also setting to: Minor - slows down but does not prevent high quality work; Low - default for minor bugs @UX - this seems like a user preference issue and I can imagine others disagreeing. I'll leave it in your capable hands to determine if we'll implement this or if we'll close it as WONTFIX. Thanks for reporting!
We're replacing our use of the 'ux-advise' component with a keyword: Component -> LibreOffice Add Keyword: needsUXEval [NinjaEdit]
Double-clicking SEARCH, IF, LEN selects this word, "A3;125" doesn't. Selection works within punctuation for =Foo(A1;ABC) =Foo(A1;B1) =Foo(123;A1) but not with =Foo(A1,123) =Foo(A1:123) =Foo(A1;123) (when A1 is recognized as reference to a cell) Don't see any reason for this inconsistency. So please fix it.
** Please read this message in its entirety before responding ** To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from http://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo'; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: https://kiwiirc.com/nextclient/irc.freenode.net/#libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug
Bug still exists in 6.0.3.2 (Fedora 28 beta) Version: 6.0.3.2 Build ID: 6.0.3.2-4.fc28 CPU threads: 8; OS: Linux 4.16; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3; Locale: en-US (en_US.UTF-8); Calc: group
Bug still exists in 6.2.2.2 (Fedora 30 beta) Version: 6.2.2.2 Build ID: 6.2.2.2-4.fc30 CPU threads: 4; OS: Linux 5.0; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3; Locale: en-US (en_US.UTF-8); UI-Language: en-US Calc: threaded
Dear Eugene Mah, To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo'; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: https://kiwiirc.com/nextclient/irc.freenode.net/#libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug
Bug still exists in 7.0.52 (Fedora 33) Version: 7.0.5.2 Build ID: 00(Build:2) CPU threads: 12; OS: Linux 5.11; UI render: default; VCL: kf5 Locale: en-US (en_US.UTF-8); UI: en-US Calc: threaded
Dear Eugene Mah, To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo'; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: https://web.libera.chat/?settings=#libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug
Bug still exists in 7.5.2.2 (Fedora 38) Version: 7.5.2.2 (X86_64) Build ID: 50(Build:2) CPU threads: 12; OS: Linux 6.2; UI render: default; VCL: kf5 (cairo+wayland) Locale: en-US (en_US.UTF-8); UI: en-US Calc: threaded
Something to check in the depths of the BreakIterator [1]. Imho, we need just to update the break iterator rules. [1] https://opengrok.libreoffice.org/xref/core/editeng/source/editeng/impedit2.cxx?r=cf42d70e#1580
See also: https://opengrok.libreoffice.org/xref/core/i18npool/source/breakiterator/data/