Bug 93087 - New layouts for LO Impress
Summary: New layouts for LO Impress
Status: NEW
Alias: None
Product: LibreOffice
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Impress (show other bugs)
Version:
(earliest affected)
5.0.0.4 rc
Hardware: All All
: medium enhancement
Assignee: Not Assigned
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks: Impress-UX
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2015-08-03 02:29 UTC by Bastián Díaz
Modified: 2024-09-26 15:52 UTC (History)
9 users (show)

See Also:
Crash report or crash signature:


Attachments
Impress layouts (88.45 KB, application/zip)
2015-08-03 02:29 UTC, Bastián Díaz
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Bastián Díaz 2015-08-03 02:29:11 UTC
Created attachment 117612 [details]
Impress layouts

Description of problem/improve:
To add to the latest enhancements to LO Impress would be great to have new layouts to create presentations or print notes and handouts.
Always good to deliver more and better options for home or professional user, especially if they help to take action more quickly without making too many changes.

Mockups:

  + Slide layouts: New creations and others based office software to be useful to create some fast sections.
  + Handout layouts: Improvements in lines to take quick notes (lighter color and line spacing 7mm, used in most notebooks).
  + Page notes Layouts: To print more efficiently speaking notes: in classic form, only page or card form.

Additional info:
The notes or handouts layouts are unique to the printing options and can not be customized before printing (customizing the notes page is very limited). MS Office solves this limitation by allowing export notes and handouts to a Word document (LO would be interesting to export directly to Draw)

Thanks
Comment 1 Buovjaga 2015-08-03 11:53:02 UTC
Have you been in contact with the design team? https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Design
IRC and mailing list are fine.
Comment 2 Yousuf Philips (jay) (retired) 2015-08-09 16:38:57 UTC
About the slide layouts, it would be good if you gave titles to these various layouts, as well as labelling of what content the various sections of the layout would have in them.

I'll let others give their opinions about the handout and notes layouts. :D
Comment 3 Robinson Tryon (qubit) 2016-08-25 05:39:32 UTC Comment hidden (obsolete)
Comment 4 Heiko Tietze 2017-07-21 09:06:22 UTC
Don't see much advantage of it- whitespace is your friend. But we should discuss it in the design meeting.
Comment 5 Bastián Díaz 2017-07-21 18:53:00 UTC
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #4)
> Don't see much advantage of it- whitespace is your friend.

I agree with you, however, the idea is not to impose a certain workflow to all users and in practice a blank slide is one more layout, so having more options will make the process easier for many users. Especially it would be good to include some proposals for Notes and Handout, which are printable and very useful options.
Comment 6 Heiko Tietze 2024-09-17 13:05:42 UTC
This could be a code pointer for the handouts
SdPage::CalculateHandoutAreas() -> nGapW = 1000; // 1cm
Comment 7 V Stuart Foote 2024-09-17 14:43:34 UTC
The Handout and Notes suggestions seem useful, especially if in addition to a printing/PDF filter we could also filter export them directly to an ODF drawing .odg

But, don't think there is too much advantage to the new slide/master slide layouts that can't already be achieved.
Comment 8 Regina Henschel 2024-09-17 15:42:06 UTC
Instead of adding more fixed layouts, we could allow customizing the layouts, see bug 78156 and its duplicates.
Comment 9 Eyal Rozenberg 2024-09-25 19:31:19 UTC
(In reply to Bastián Díaz from comment #0)
> Mockups:

Repeating a comment I made at the design meeting: Personally I can't know whether I like the new layouts or not without seeing "before" vs "after" images. The layout mockups are in themselves sufficient to make a decision: I need an actual slide laid out in the existing layout and the new layout, then I can tell when I think they're better.

Also, it's theoretically possible I (or anybody else) would like some of the layouts, and disapprove of other layouts.

Too bad more people have noticed this bug before! It shouldn't have taken 9 years to review this.
Comment 10 Heiko Tietze 2024-09-26 08:05:53 UTC
We briefly discussed the topic in the design meeting.

The proposed enhancement is welcome. It needs a before/after example or an implemented prototype to make educated comments on the design. While customizing the layouts as requested in bug 78156 would be great, it doesn't dispense us from shipping good examples.