Bug 93627 - new version of DEC2BIN() and HEX2BIN() with support of more than 10 binary digits
Summary: new version of DEC2BIN() and HEX2BIN() with support of more than 10 binary di...
Status: NEW
Alias: None
Product: LibreOffice
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Calc (show other bugs)
Version:
(earliest affected)
unspecified
Hardware: All All
: lowest enhancement
Assignee: Not Assigned
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks: Calc-Function
  Show dependency tree / graph
 
Reported: 2015-08-24 15:17 UTC by Valerio Messina
Modified: 2020-08-12 19:50 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Crash report or crash signature:

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Valerio Messina 2015-08-24 15:17:59 UTC 
DEC2BIN() and HEX2BIN() support 10 binary digits only.
While 10 digit are enough for decimal and hex numbers, 10 bit are very few for
a binary number. Consider that as two's complement representation, the range is
restricted to -512 / +511 only. Binary numbers should be supported up to 32 or 64 bit.
As current DEC2BIN() and HEX2BIN() are stuck to 10 binary digits for compatibility reason (see https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45950), we need new (related) functions to generate more than 10 binary digits.
Comment 1 Joel Madero 2015-08-24 15:35:15 UTC 
Opening a new bug report is not the right way to go here. An expert developer on the other issue closed it and said it would be "even worse" to create yet another formula. Please keep comments to the original bug report and discuss this with the expert developer (Eike) on that bug report. Closing this as a duplicate.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 45950 ***
Comment 2 Valerio Messina 2015-08-24 17:21:48 UTC 
there should be an error.
Where did you read 'said it would be "even worse" to create yet another formula'?

At the opposite, the conclusion by Eike was that we need to implement two new functions, because the old one must be remain untouched for compatibility.
This is why I opened this new bug, to ask two new functions with support for more binary digits. I propose DEC2BINARY() and HEX2BINARY()
Comment 3 Joel Madero 2015-08-24 17:32:46 UTC 
Eike - thoughts here? Valid enhancement or did I read your previous comments right from bug 45950?
Comment 4 Eike Rathke 2015-08-25 10:29:23 UTC 
Well, it is of course a valid RFE, but with very low priority, and as such not exactly a duplicate of bug 45950.

Note that for positive numbers there's always the possibility to convert using the BASE() and DECIMAL() functions, e.g. BASE(DECIMAL("beef",16),2) for hex2bin.