Created attachment 121321 [details] Example .svg figure with many Y axes. Currently, Chart is limited since it does not allow to have more than two Y axes. In scientific publications, it is very common to use charts with many Y axes. I attach such example chart taken from an article published in the Science journal.
Valid enhancement request. Setting as NEW. Note: setting an enhancement as NEW does not presume that some developer will work on its implementation. Best regards. JBF
Obviously one may want also to allow more than 1 X axis. Changing title accordingly.
(In reply to Frederic Parrenin from comment #2) > Obviously one may want also to allow more than 1 X axis. > Changing title accordingly. Please, could you attach an example of a chart with more than 1 x-axis and more than 2 y-axis. If I look correctly your first example, it is a set of 3 charts where the 3 legends are grouped in one legend. Best regards. JBF
Created attachment 121355 [details] Example .svg figure with many axes
In my first example, the three charts are not independent since they share the same X axis. As far as I know, it is not possible to do such a figure in LO Chart. Now, I attach another figure with 5 Y axes and 2 X axes (the secondary X axis is not regular but that is another issue...).
I was wondering if anybody is willing to work on that? This is crucially needed before I can seriously use calc in my scientific field.
This issue is still valid in LO 6.0. It would be a strong selling argument for LO Calc with respect to MS Excel if such a feature was implemented (together with bug 96538). I know many people which have to move their spreadsheet data to another more advanced graphing software because of this limitation.
Created attachment 148814 [details] Another chart style with 3 Y axes In this style the series are not stacked but share the same space (requires less height).
As of 7.0, this feature is still not yet implemented.
As of 7.2.5, this functionality has not yet been implemented.
Why did you do the summary lest precise than it was? Best regards. JBF
Because it is actually possible to have a secondary X-axis. I am not sure if this is new or not, but the previous title is therefore wrong.