Created attachment 126214 [details]
Document name: IAA.docx
3. Right part of the document over laps the left part:
Actual Behaviour: https://tinytake.mangoapps.com/sf/ODMwMzlfMzQ4MjkxNA
Expected behaviour: https://tinytake.mangoapps.com/sf/ODI5OTdfMzQ4MDQ5Mg
4. Title is shown empty:
Actual Behaviour: https://tinytake.mangoapps.com/sf/ODMwNDBfMzQ4MjkxNQ
Expected behaviour: https://tinytake.mangoapps.com/sf/ODI5OThfMzQ4MDQ5Mw
(In reply to Alankrit from comment #0)
> Created attachment 126214 [details]
> Sample file
> Document name: IAA.docx
> 3. Right part of the document over laps the left part:
> Actual Behaviour: https://tinytake.mangoapps.com/sf/ODMwMzlfMzQ4MjkxNA
> Expected behaviour: https://tinytake.mangoapps.com/sf/ODI5OTdfMzQ4MDQ5Mg
Please create a new report for issue 4 like I mentioned in the other report.
Arch Linux 64-bit, KDE Plasma 5
Build ID: ab1b351840160655a9f0caedbb35e9fdf203c5a0
CPU Threads: 8; OS Version: Linux 4.6; UI Render: default;
Locale: fi-FI (fi_FI.UTF-8); Calc: group
Built on July 16th 2016
(In reply to Buovjaga from comment #1)
> (In reply to Alankrit from comment #0)
> > Created attachment 126214 [details]
> > Sample file
> > Document name: IAA.docx
> > 3. Right part of the document over laps the left part:
> > Actual Behaviour: https://tinytake.mangoapps.com/sf/ODMwMzlfMzQ4MjkxNA
> > Expected behaviour: https://tinytake.mangoapps.com/sf/ODI5OTdfMzQ4MDQ5Mg
> Please create a new report for issue 4 like I mentioned in the other report.
> Arch Linux 64-bit, KDE Plasma 5
> Version: 184.108.40.206.alpha0+
> Build ID: ab1b351840160655a9f0caedbb35e9fdf203c5a0
> CPU Threads: 8; OS Version: Linux 4.6; UI Render: default;
> Locale: fi-FI (fi_FI.UTF-8); Calc: group
> Built on July 16th 2016
Bug id for second bug
Can I have an estimate when the bug would be solved
(In reply to Alankrit from comment #3)
> Can I have an estimate when the bug would be solved
Yes, if you are willing to pay for the fix. If you use LibreOffice for your business, I guess it won't be a problem. Here are certified developers: https://www.documentfoundation.org/gethelp/developers/
I did some more testing and the overlap is present already in 220.127.116.11 (Win 7). In 3.5 the layout is way more messed up.
Created attachment 137822 [details]
just in case if link [ https://tinytake.mangoapps.com/sf/ODI5OTdfMzQ4MDQ5Mg ] dies
Repro 3.6. to 6.2+. Not a regression. Renamed.
Alakrit, you closed the bug that is not fixed, without explanation.
If you're not interested, you may mark "Ignore Bug Mail" but please let's keep open until it's resolved. Whenever and if it happens.
To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year.
There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present.
If you have time, please do the following:
Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/
If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice.
If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice.
Please DO NOT
Update the version field
Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker)
Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not
appropriate in this case)
If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so:
1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from http://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/
2. Test your bug
3. Leave a comment with your results.
4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo';
4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword
Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: https://kiwiirc.com/nextclient/irc.freenode.net/#libreoffice-qa
Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone!
Created attachment 156070 [details]
Sample compared in MSO and LO
Repro Lo 6.5+.
Created attachment 166610 [details]
Simplified example file to demonstrate the problem better
Created attachment 166611 [details]
The simplified example file in Word 2013 and Writer 7.1master
The problem with the original file is that the textbox is anchored inside the table on the left and the table has a -1.24 cm left indent. This is handled differently.
In Word, the textbox of this file is aligned to an absolute cm value right of a column. Even if the table has a left indent, it has no role in the alignment of the textbox. The attachment has three pairs of table and textbox anchored inside it:
- 11 cm table with 2 cm left indent, with a textbox aligned 13 cm right of column.
- 4 cm table with 0 cm left indent, with a textbox aligned 4 cm right of column.
- 4 cm table with -1 cm left indent, with a textbox aligned 3 cm right of column.
In Word the textboxes start next to the right edge of the table.
In Writer the textboxes start:
- 2 cm right of the tables right edge
- 0 cm right of the tables right edge - same as in Word
- 1 cm left of the tables right edge, overlapping it.
On the second page the tables with non-0 left indent are copied with textboxes anchored outside them in the previous paragraph. In these cases the layout is correct.
So at least for docx import the layout should not consider the left indent of the table containing the textbox shapes anchor.
One more observation:
Currently all these shapes are imported with a horizontal position to "Paragraph Area".
Changing this manually to "Page text area" in case of the table-anchored textboxes recreates the original layout.
Not sure if the same, but let me keep it here so far: DOCX attachment 114591 [details] from bug 90442 that looks like attachment 170085 [details].
shape positions misplaced
Line position, Looks like vertical positioning. Anyway, it's differently shown in MSO (to paragraph) and LO (to margin).