Created attachment 127615 [details] style Demonstration Bodhi Linux LibreOffice 5.2.0.4 Steps: 1. Open attachment; 2. Copy the first set of numbered items from 1 - 3 3. Paste below Test3 Observed: you get a numbered list from 4 - 6, 4 & 5 have one style, 6 gets part of a different style. 4 & 5 are "text body" entirely, 6 is "default style" which is the same as Test3 but font size is not the same. Expected: Everything is just like the original copy
Hi @Joel, there is an option to 'Restart at this paragraph' that it's no enable on the paragraph below "Test1", but it's enable on the paragraph below "Test2". That option is also available on the context menu. Copying from the first group of numbered paragraphs happens what you comment but not copying from the second group under 'Test2' Resolved as not a bug, please if you are not agree reopen it.
I'm not sure how that explains the inconsistent behavior where two lines show up as one style and the third line shows up as a different style. I'm going to test MSO to see what behavior it has
Microsoft Office pastes as expected. The numbers are 4-6 on the paste and all are identical style to the previous styles for the numbered lists (i.e., matches the copy entirely)
Sorry @Joel my mistake reading you comment. I think the issue is that' needed to copy the end of paragraph to avoid that the last paragraph mix with the paragraph where it's pasted. Copying with the end of paragraph included works as expected.
So there are two issues i see here 1. should pasting number lists reset the number back to one. This is a UX decision to make and i would be for resetting it to one. 2. direct formatting applied to the paragraph that is being pasted to is being applied to the last entry of the list. This is a bug to me and appears if you dont copy the crlf (aka \r\n) at the end of the numbered item 3.
(In reply to Yousuf Philips (jay) from comment #5) > So there are two issues i see here > > 1. should pasting number lists reset the number back to one. This is a UX > decision to make and i would be for resetting it to one. I can't see change a paragraph format without ask the user, introducing a direct format. And I'm not sure this specific case is the usual, maybe more usual paste to have new paragraphs included in a list. > > 2. direct formatting applied to the paragraph that is being pasted to is > being applied to the last entry of the list. This is a bug to me and appears > if you dont copy the crlf (aka \r\n) at the end of the numbered item 3. What paragraph style must be when pasting part of a paragraph in another?, I think only direct format is carried with the pasted text and for the pasted text. Perhaps the issue is more about select easily with the crlf included to copy. Now you need to go with mouse to the beginning of the next line.
this is not a ' style' test, but a direct formatting test ;) I copied 1-3 and pasted below test3 .. formatting remains the same. Will attach screen print. I selected Test1-Test2 and hit Ctrl+M and see the real styles.
Created attachment 127632 [details] result of pasting 1-3 below Test 3 and clearing formatting etc.
Created attachment 127633 [details] result from test in daily 20160924
(In reply to m.a.riosv from comment #6) > I can't see change a paragraph format without ask the user, introducing a > direct format. > And I'm not sure this specific case is the usual, maybe more usual paste to > have new paragraphs included in a list. If a user copied list entries 1, 2 and 3, it wouldnt make sense that it pasted 4, 5, and 6 unless it was being pasted below entry 3. Also when it pastes 4, 5, and 6, it isnt even linked to the entries that are copied, so that if you added a 4th entry under Test1, it would increment the pasted ones. You can see that pasting as unformatted text does it the right way. > What paragraph style must be when pasting part of a paragraph in another?, I > think only direct format is carried with the pasted text and for the pasted > text. If i paste unformatted text, it should use the style already set at the pasted position, but when i paste with formatting, html format or rtf, it should be exactly like what i've copied. > Perhaps the issue is more about select easily with the crlf included to > copy. Now you need to go with mouse to the beginning of the next line. You can see if i paste with html format and havent copied the crlf, the 3rd entry is fine, but it messes up the first entry, so not copying the crlf isnt the issue. If i paste with rtf and havent copied the crlf, it messes up the first and third entries.
Created attachment 127651 [details] screencast Shows the behaviour of pasting formatted text, html, and rtf with and without the crlf.
** Please read this message in its entirety before responding ** To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present on a currently supported version of LibreOffice (5.4.1 or 5.3.6 https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the version of LibreOffice and your operating system, and any changes you see in the bug behavior If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a short comment that includes your version of LibreOffice and Operating System Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) http://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to "inherited from OOo"; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add "regression" to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug-20170929
Dear Joel Madero, To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from http://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo'; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: https://kiwiirc.com/nextclient/irc.freenode.net/#libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug
(In reply to Joel Madero from comment #0) > Created attachment 127615 [details] > Steps: > 1. Open attachment; > 2. Copy the first set of numbered items from 1 - 3 > 3. Paste below Test3 > > Observed: you get a numbered list from 4 - 6, 4 & 5 have one style, 6 gets > part of a different style. 4 & 5 are "text body" entirely, 6 is "default > style" which is the same as Test3 but font size is not the same. Test 7.0+. 4-6 are all Text Body. > Expected: Everything is just like the original copy Green because bug 105352 *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 105352 ***