PDF Export is slower as it has been before
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Attachment 134260 [details]
2. Export it with default setting
3. Take notice of the time required
The time required for export is around 110 seconds with LibO184.108.40.206
LibO 220.127.116.11 requires only 77 seconds
LibO 18.104.22.168 requires just 12 seconds
User Profile Reset: No
Build ID: cb37c5f0f3de7b545231a53d46a5271058af76ad
CPU threads: 4; OS: Windows 6.19; UI render: default;
TinderBox: Win-x86@42, Branch:master, Time: 2017-06-23_06:55:41
Locale: nl-NL (nl_NL); Calc: CL
but not in
Build ID: 05dceb5d363845f2cf968344d7adab8dcfb2ba71
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/45.0
Created attachment 134373 [details]
Callgrind output from master
Arch Linux 64-bit, KDE Plasma 5
Build ID: f808c50c6eece87d515df3b84b1c774395b5d9bc
CPU threads: 8; OS: Linux 4.11; UI render: default; VCL: kde4;
Locale: fi-FI (fi_FI.UTF-8); Calc: group
Built on June 26th 2017
Serge Krot committed a patch related to this issue.
It has been pushed to "master":
related tdf#108757 small enhancements for speed up
It will be available in 6.0.0.
The patch should be included in the daily builds available at
http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/ in the next 24-48 hours. More
information about daily builds can be found at:
Affected users are encouraged to test the fix and report feedback.
Not perfect, but a lot better (- +/- 40 sec) with
Build ID: cc1db6f2b0ebe05ae807628778835b62df00eca2
CPU threads: 4; OS: Windows 6.3; UI render: default;
TinderBox: Win-x86@42, Branch:master, Time: 2017-12-02_23:45:34
Locale: nl-NL (nl_NL); Calc: CL
(In reply to Telesto from comment #3)
> Not perfect, but a lot better (- +/- 40 sec) with
> Version: 22.214.171.124.alpha0+
> Build ID: cc1db6f2b0ebe05ae807628778835b62df00eca2
> CPU threads: 4; OS: Windows 6.3; UI render: default;
> TinderBox: Win-x86@42, Branch:master, Time: 2017-12-02_23:45:34
> Locale: nl-NL (nl_NL); Calc: CL
Serge: thanks for your work! Should a new report be opened with more specific goals defined? Or do you want to keep this open?
(In reply to Telesto from comment #0)
> Expected Results:
> LibO 126.96.36.199 requires only 77 seconds
> LibO 188.8.131.52 requires just 12 seconds
For this change, according to Linux 43max repo the blame is
Author: Matthew Francis <email@example.com>
Date: Thu May 28 18:31:27 2015 +0800
Author: Kohei Yoshida <firstname.lastname@example.org>
AuthorDate: Thu Jan 23 14:06:34 2014 -0500
Commit: Kohei Yoshida <email@example.com>
CommitDate: Thu Jan 23 14:12:58 2014 -0500
fdo#73986: Don't forget to receive returned object from for_each.
To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year.
There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present.
If you have time, please do the following:
Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/
If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice.
If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice.
Please DO NOT
Update the version field
Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker)
Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not
appropriate in this case)
If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so:
1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from http://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/
2. Test your bug
3. Leave a comment with your results.
4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo';
4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword
Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: https://kiwiirc.com/nextclient/irc.freenode.net/#libreoffice-qa
Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone!