Created attachment 134310 [details] screenshot of unwanted result importing a pdf with small areas into draw (d&d) results in big rectangles
Created attachment 134311 [details] pdf-source
Reproduced in Version: 6.0.0.0.alpha0+ Build ID: 08f6f9dded1b142b858c455da03319abac691655 CPU Threads: 4; OS Version: Linux 4.8; UI Render: default; VCL: gtk2; Locale: ca-ES (ca_ES.UTF-8); Calc: group and LibreOffice 3.3.0 OOO330m19 (Build:6) tag libreoffice-3.3.0.4
Confirmed, but this affects just the pdfimport import filter (checked Draw, Writer, Impress) but not the new pdfium based ipdf insert filter. If sample is inserted as image it is formatted correctly.
Sorry, the difference is: pdfimport => vector pdfmium => pixel
(In reply to georg.weickelt from comment #4) > Sorry, the difference is: > pdfimport => vector > pdfmium => pixel And? Two simple facts... LibreOffice is _not_ a PDF editor, and PDF is _not_ intended to be an editable format. For this PDF, the pdfium based insert handles the area fills correctly, the pdfio filter import does not. Inadequacies of the PDF Import filter--pdfio (which breaks apart a PDF into component Draw objects) are well known as are the issue here with clipping these area fills (this should probably be closed as a duplicate of bug 86211). Our move to pdfium for insertion of PDF as an image, with loss of "break" (with its call the pdfio filter), gives very high quality raster rendering of PDF into ODF documents. What the vast majority of users require and the direction we've taken our handling of PDF. Further work on the pdfio import filter is needed and will occur--though personally I think export handling are the higher priority. Meanwhile, Miklos continues to work with Google's pdfiumm based filter. We hope the eventual introduction of a skia based integration to canvas will restore vector based PDF rendering, but it is not there yet (bug 106581).
Is the management of transparent background with pdfmium fixed in the forthcoming LibO 6? Otherwise, for many applications the pixel perfect pdfmium remains not an option.
** Please read this message in its entirety before responding ** To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from http://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo'; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: https://kiwiirc.com/nextclient/irc.freenode.net/#libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug
The error still exists in version: 6.1.4.2 (x64)
Dear georg.weickelt, To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo'; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: https://kiwiirc.com/nextclient/irc.freenode.net/#libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug
Repro 7.2+
Dear georg.weickelt, To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo'; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: https://web.libera.chat/?settings=#libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug
Bug ist still present in Version: 7.4.6.2 (x64) / LibreOffice Community Build ID: 5b1f5509c2decdade7fda905e3e1429a67acd63d CPU threads: 20; OS: Windows 10.0 Build 22621; UI render: Skia/Raster; VCL: win Locale: de-DE (de_DE); UI: de-DE Calc: threaded Importing as an image leads to poorer image quality - therefore a functioning PDF import with vectors as the result would be desirable. Changes to the content are not most important - rather additions.