Bug 110747 - Pointer not displayed in the same spot that is clicked; Weird vertical gap/misimatch.
Summary: Pointer not displayed in the same spot that is clicked; Weird vertical gap/mi...
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 110438
Alias: None
Product: LibreOffice
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Base (show other bugs)
Version:
(earliest affected)
5.3.4.2 release
Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64) Windows (All)
: medium normal
Assignee: Not Assigned
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2017-08-01 00:03 UTC by YourMom
Modified: 2017-08-01 09:16 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Crash report or crash signature:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description YourMom 2017-08-01 00:03:54 UTC
Description:
First, you need to have a place I can upload a fucking picture, because it is worth a million words and I wouldn't have to waste my time writing this and your time reading it.

Pretend that this is the screen is a matrix, which it is, like so:
ooooo...
ooooo...
ooooo...
.
.
.

In any Libre Office App in the Suite, I have to click BELOW the spot I want to click in order to actually click the desired button, menu, or whatever object....Even a word on the "page".

There is a very good point to using a pointer, and that is to actually point at the thing you click at so that you know what you are clicking. 

I expect when I place my pointer on the "x" below and click, that the same spot (with an "x") in row 2 will be "clicked" inside the software:
1st row ==> ooooo
2nd row ==> ooxoo
3rd row ==> ooooo

Well, that simply does NOT happen. This is what happens instead: The "y" below represents the spot "clicked" by the software when the pointer is placed at the spot with the "x".
1st row ==> ooyoo
2nd row ==> ooxoo
3rd row ==> ooooo

So, that fundamental pointer-to-click syncronization is broken in your product.

I am surprised you haven't seen this before.

I am using Windows 10 on an Intel NUC w/ Intel i7.

Fix it or I am moving on. Great idea, but non-functional is non-function, whether it is free or not :/

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Read the description above
2. Work on the ability to accept photo uploads...It IS 2017 ...
3. Test before releasing

Actual Results:  
above

Expected Results:
above


Reproducible: Always

User Profile Reset: What?

Additional Info:
Again. Photo Upload


User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/59.0.3071.115 Safari/537.36
Comment 1 Xisco Faulí 2017-08-01 00:43:15 UTC Comment hidden (obsolete)
Comment 2 Xisco Faulí 2017-08-01 09:16:44 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 110438 ***