In https://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/tree/i18npool/source/localedata/data/hu_HU.xml the following date formats are duplicated: YYYY". "MMMM D. 3x YY-MM-DD 2x YYYY-MM-DD 2x YYYY". "MMM D. 2x YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM:SS 2x And the following time format: YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM:SS 2x Actual results: The rows listed above are multiple times in the code (three times, twice, twice, twice). Expected results: One individual format code should only be used once.
Please leave this open, I know a new volunteer for this task :)
There is a fix in https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/#/c/55637/ for the plain dates. The reason of the same format was the fixed format for back compatibility: https://opengrok.libreoffice.org/xref/core/i18npool/source/localedata/data/locale.dtd#223 Using the NatNum12, it's possible to replace the duplicates with useful date variants.
Adam, maybe one for you? With a bit of mentoring by Laszlo.
László Németh committed a patch related to this issue. It has been pushed to "master": http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=61c713bf93a1c585730b97265e2ba7a5a4d09d1d tdf#118127 fix date format duplications in Hungarian locale It will be available in 6.2.0. The patch should be included in the daily builds available at http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/ in the next 24-48 hours. More information about daily builds can be found at: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Testing_Daily_Builds Affected users are encouraged to test the fix and report feedback.
A polite ping to László Németh: Is this bug fixed? if so, could you please close it as RESOLVED FIXED ? Otherwise, Could you please explain what's missing? Thanks
Xisco, Eike: The commit has solved this problem. The started 6.1 backport (https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/#/c/59201/.) got -1 from Eike, related to the overuse of the month abbreviations for the two kind of Hungarian month abbreviations, but maybe this is not a serious problem, regarding to the non-existing 1-letter month abbrevations of Hungarian. See his comments and my questions in https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/#/c/59171/. Eike, what is your opinion, is it ok to close this issue, as resolved/fixed, also accepting its backport? Thanks for your helps!
Please see my latest comment at https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/59171 I don't think the change qualifies for a backport, it does not solve the month name problem because the narrow name formats are not persistent in an ODF roundtrip.
Eike Rathke committed a patch related to this issue. It has been pushed to "master": http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=e85966450b770e1169f113183ce1a9a9f4dcc507 Related: tdf#119613 tdf#118127 suppress duplicated builtins, rework All cat It will be available in 6.2.0. The patch should be included in the daily builds available at http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/ in the next 24-48 hours. More information about daily builds can be found at: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Testing_Daily_Builds Affected users are encouraged to test the fix and report feedback.