Spellcheck highlight(red line) doesn't update if user change(fix spell) some word and move cursor to an other word. Space or new line entering is required to update spellcheck highlight. Steps to reproduce: Enter "Dog and cat" Change to "Dogr and cat" Move cursor from "Dogr" to an other word using mouse or arrow buttons. Actual result: "Dogr" isn't highlighted as incorrect word. User should enter space or new line after Dogr word to update highlight. Expected result(works well in Microsoft Word Online): "Dogr" should be highlighted as incorrect word. Possible it is not bug and it is just specific behavior. But I think LO should update spellcheck highlight dynamically(without entering space or new line after specific words).
Repro with Version: 6.3.0.0.alpha0+ Build ID: beae6c7a7f163daad0d4dea63a3d403af2745fd1 CPU threads: 4; OS: Windows 6.3; UI render: default; VCL: win; TinderBox: Win-x86@42, Branch:master, Time: 2018-12-06_23:55:16 Locale: en-US (nl_NL); UI-Language: en-US Calc: CL and with Version: 5.1.0.0.alpha1+ Build ID: 49c2b9808df8a6b197dec666dfc0cda6321a4306 Threads 4; Ver: Windows 6.29; Render: GL; but not with Versie: 4.4.7.2 Build ID: f3153a8b245191196a4b6b9abd1d0da16eead600 Locale: nl_NL
This changed between 470848093a2687a6d8056629da6b43773ff4cb0c..86aebe9e5b084a737ce18e4620e8d8f0998eb5a1 and I suspect its... commit 4c91e94e892943ef5e031d65f6f42864233cb4cd Author: Michael Stahl <mstahl@redhat.com> Date: Wed Sep 9 10:30:04 2015 +0200 tdf#92036: sw: fix idle spelling loop
ah, its right there in the commit message. "Notably this means if the user just moves the cursor out of the wrongly spelled word, it won't be underlined yet, but that appears a minor issue, and checking when the cursor leaves the word appears too hard to implement"
(In reply to Caolán McNamara from comment #3) > ah, its right there in the commit message. > > "Notably this means if the user just moves the cursor out of the wrongly > spelled word, it won't be underlined yet, but that appears a minor issue, > and checking when the cursor leaves the word appears too hard to implement" Lets remove the regression keyword...
Dear larionenkoruslan@gmail.com, To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo'; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: https://kiwiirc.com/nextclient/irc.freenode.net/#libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug
Dear larionenkoruslan@gmail.com, To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo'; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: https://web.libera.chat/?settings=#libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug