- Writer document - View > Toolbar > (TSCP) Classification - use list from toolbar and apply Confidential > watermark appears in the document (as defined in policy file) (as well as header and footer text) This is OK - New document - Open dialog Document Classification - select Confidential from list Classification - hit OK > no watermark appears in the document It is easy to see per version, by comparing result from toolbar and from dialog! 600 rc1 > watermark OK 601 rc1 > no watermark 620 rc1 > no watermark master 63 > watermark OK .. would be great if this can be fixed in 6.2 version - hence the report. Version: 6.2.0.1 Build ID: 0412ee99e862f384c1106d0841a950c4cfaa9df1 CPU threads: 4; OS: Linux 4.15; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3; Locale: nl-NL (nl_NL.UTF-8); UI-Language: en-US Calc: threaded Version: 6.3.0.0.alpha0+ Build ID: 3bf82348bc73797fec61997dc4268a322299b3ff CPU threads: 4; OS: Linux 4.15; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3; TinderBox: Linux-rpm_deb-x86_64@86-TDF, Branch:master, Time: 2019-01-06_08:29:45 Locale: nl-NL (nl_NL.UTF-8); UI-Language: en-US Calc: threaded
@raal: could you pls confirm this one?
Hi Cor, checked with 6.2.3 and seems to be fixed. Please, can you retest it?
Hi Raal, (In reply to raal from comment #2) > checked with 6.2.3 and seems to be fixed. Please, can you retest it? Thanks - however 6.2.0.3 doesn't resolve the issue for me. I'll attach the two xml-files involved. example_nl-NL.xml and example.xml The first is only used with nl-NL locale. But without that one, so with the international version only, I have the same problem. Maybe you can attach your xml files?
Created attachment 148927 [details] example file nl-NL
Created attachment 148928 [details] example file international
I'm not sure, if I did it right, but for me it seems to be fixed in Version: 6.2.5.2 (x64) Build-ID: 1ec314fa52f458adc18c4f025c545a4e8b22c159 CPU-Threads: 4; BS: Windows 10.0; UI-Render: GL; VCL: win; Gebietsschema: de-DE (de_DE); UI-Sprache: de-DE Calc: threaded Or perhaps only Linux? Cor, are you still able to reproduce it? => NEEDINFO
Dear Cor Nouws, This bug has been in NEEDINFO status with no change for at least 6 months. Please provide the requested information as soon as possible and mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED. Due to regular bug tracker maintenance, if the bug is still in NEEDINFO status with no change in 30 days the QA team will close the bug as INSUFFICIENTDATA due to lack of needed information. For more information about our NEEDINFO policy please read the wiki located here: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/Fields/Status/NEEDINFO If you have already provided the requested information, please mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED so that the QA team knows that the bug is ready to be confirmed. Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-NeedInfo-Ping
(In reply to Dieter from comment #6) > I'm not sure, if I did it right, but for me it seems to be fixed in > > Version: 6.2.5.2 (x64) > .... > Cor, are you still able to reproduce it? => NEEDINFO Still a problem in Versie: 6.4.0.3 Build ID: b0a288ab3d2d4774cb44b62f04d5d28733ac6df8 CPU-threads: 8; Besturingssysteem: Linux 5.3; UI-render: standaard; VCL: gtk3; Locale: nl-NL (en_US.UTF-8); UI-taal: nl-NL Calc: threaded New document > Toolbar > Confidential > Watermark in document New document > Dialog > Confidential > OK > NO Watermark in document
Created attachment 159335 [details] Result ODT Not sure if I'm understanding correctly, I used the following steps: - Cleared user profile (just in case). - Started Writer, UI/locale is en-US/en-US. - Enabled TSCP Classification toolbar. - Clicked Manage Document Classification button on toolbar. - In the dialog, selected Confidential from Classification dropdown, and clicked OK. Got the attached document as result, ie. with the watermark included, with LO 6.4.0.3 / Ubuntu. Cor, can you please comment if the above is supposed to trigger the bug, or if I should do something differently?
Dear Cor Nouws, Please read this message in its entirety before proceeding. Your bug report is being closed as INSUFFICIENTDATA due to inactivity and a lack of information which is needed in order to accurately reproduce and confirm the problem. We encourage you to retest your bug against the latest release. If the issue is still present in the latest stable release, we need the following information (please ignore any that you've already provided): a) Provide details of your system including your operating system and the latest version of LibreOffice that you have confirmed the bug to be present b) Provide easy to reproduce steps – the simpler the better c) Provide any test case(s) which will help us confirm the problem d) Provide screenshots of the problem if you think it might help e) Read all comments and provide any requested information Once all of this is done, please set the bug back to UNCONFIRMED and we will attempt to reproduce the issue. Please do not: a) respond via email b) update the version field in the bug or any of the other details on the top section of our bug tracker Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-NeedInfo-FollowUp