Created attachment 149022 [details]
Different Footnote Style
When have an Footnote the syle in MSO 2010 is different than in LibO 6.2.
I think only the numbering has to be superscripted cause everything else look good to me.
Thank you for reporting the bug. Please attach a sample document, as this makes it easier for us to verify the bug.
(Please note that the attachment will be public, remove any sensitive information before attaching it.
See https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/FAQ#How_can_I_eliminate_confidential_data_from_a_sample_document.3F for help on how to do so.)
I have set the bug's status to 'NEEDINFO'. Please change it back to 'UNCONFIRMED' once the requested document is provided.
Created attachment 149138 [details]
Footnote Style docx
Attached the docx file that will not propper open.
Footnote style in MSO 2016: Footnote after a blank paragraph
LO 6.3: Footnote number in one paragaph and footnote text in a new paragraph
Version: 22.214.171.124.alpha0+ (x64)
Build ID: 421e6fc3cd2e6fe37afbef341e2d0ad7b8edde37
CPU threads: 4; OS: Windows 10.0; UI render: GL; VCL: win;
TinderBox: Win-x86_64@42, Branch:master, Time: 2019-04-07_01:12:58
Locale: en-US (de_DE); UI-Language: en-US
and also in
Version: 126.96.36.199 (x64)
CPU-Threads: 4; BS: Windows 6.19; UI-Render: GL;
Gebietsschema: de-DE (de_DE); Calc: CL
Created attachment 155590 [details]
tdf123262_textFootnoteSeparators.docx: clear and simple unit test
A working, but probably lousy implementation can be seen at https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/82172.
The issue here is that MSO allows ANY kind of text to be included in the separator footnote - including multiple paragraphs (in OP's case a blank line).
In this fix I am just throwing that (very unusual) information away. One enhancement would be to add that text prior to the first footnote marker (if that is even possible, which it probably isn't).