Bug 123941 - Font reflection effect from Word 365 gets lost in LO
Summary: Font reflection effect from Word 365 gets lost in LO
Status: NEW
Alias: None
Product: LibreOffice
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Writer (show other bugs)
Version:
(earliest affected)
6.2.1.1 rc
Hardware: All All
: medium enhancement
Assignee: Not Assigned
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords: filter:ooxml
Depends on:
Blocks: Font-Effects DOCX-Character
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2019-03-08 12:04 UTC by Marco A.G.Pinto
Modified: 2022-06-09 14:21 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

See Also:
Crash report or crash signature:
Regression By:


Attachments
Shadow effect in Word 365 (24.51 KB, application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document)
2019-03-08 12:04 UTC, Marco A.G.Pinto
Details
Screenshot of the document (28.42 KB, image/png)
2019-03-11 12:52 UTC, Heiko Tietze
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Marco A.G.Pinto 2019-03-08 12:04:44 UTC
Created attachment 149820 [details]
Shadow effect in Word 365

Hello!

When I open this .docx in LibreOffice 6.2.1 there is no shadow below the text.
Comment 1 Dieter 2019-03-08 12:29:29 UTC
I confirm the behaviour, but I don't think, that this feature (font reflection) is part of LO. So perhaps it's also a enhancement request.

Let's see, what design teams thinks about it
Comment 2 Heiko Tietze 2019-03-11 12:52:24 UTC
Created attachment 149881 [details]
Screenshot of the document

Font reflection is not shadow (that we do have). And since it's not part of the ODF standard, at least I'm not aware of this, we shouldn't implement non-standard features. => WF
Comment 3 Heiko Tietze 2019-05-28 08:31:57 UTC
No further opinion, so closing as WF.
Comment 4 Tomaz Vajngerl 2019-05-28 09:29:58 UTC
If it's not part od ODF doesn't mean we won't implement it. If so we can close all bugs related to document themes, multi-colour gradients, blur shadows and glow effect and similar features that we currently don't have in LO and are not part of ODF.

As this is part of OOXML, we will have to implement it for compatibility reasons (or the OOXML documents that include it won't be rendered correctly) and provide a proposal to extend ODF, so this is indeed a valid enhancement request IMHO.
Comment 5 Heiko Tietze 2019-05-28 09:43:58 UTC
Reopening to NEW as of comment 4. Not my opinion, though.