Description: I have a 295 pages document with about 10 images appearing here and there in it. There is one, though, that doesn't print. It appears fine in the LibreOffice document, but the PDF doesn't contain the image, just its frame. Actual Results: I open my document, I select Print in the menu, I chose to print in a file, I ask that there are to pages printed side to side (1 2) : Tadam ! One image is missing. Expected Results: Image not present in the PDF. Reproducible: Always User Profile Reset: No Additional Info: Put the image in it, like all the others.
Please attach the document OR better try to make a minimal anonymized sample document that reproduces the bug and preferably attach that one. Would be nice if you could also test with master https://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/master/.
Created attachment 150436 [details] I isolated the page with the image that doesn't print. I would like to attach the PDF with the missing image too, but apparently, I can attach only ONE document here. Anyway, the bug doesn't occur when I print only one page per sheet, but it comes back when I print TWO pages per sheet of paper.
Comment on attachment 150436 [details] I isolated the page with the image that doesn't print. Are you working on this case ?
Reproduced in Version: 6.3.0.0.alpha0+ Build ID: 040a54d89e8ca33171e86647ced8dc58efd85fbe CPU threads: 4; OS: Linux 4.15; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3; Locale: ca-ES (ca_ES.UTF-8); UI-Language: en-US Calc: threaded
Created attachment 150622 [details] output
Also reproduced in Version: 5.2.0.0.alpha1+ Build ID: 5b168b3fa568e48e795234dc5fa454bf24c9805e CPU Threads: 4; OS Version: Linux 4.15; UI Render: default; Locale: ca-ES (ca_ES.UTF-8)
Print to file as PDF with two pages per sheet works with the last commit of Linux 50max bibisect repo
And where can I find that commit ? Is that an earlier version of LibreOffice ? Or has the bug been fixed in the 6.2.2.2 version ? Thanks ! Fred Lemire
(In reply to Fred Lemire from comment #8) > And where can I find that commit ? Is that an earlier version of LibreOffice > ? Or has the bug been fixed in the 6.2.2.2 version ? https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bibisect/Linux Xisco confirmed it in comment 4 with 6.3, so it has not been fixed. I just tested on Windows and could not reproduce.
Working in my case. Version: 6.3.0.0.alpha0+ Build ID: 84d4125b28c384f9ac6285737a5bb9093978798e CPU threads: 4; OS: Linux 4.15; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3; TinderBox: Linux-rpm_deb-x86_64@86-TDF, Branch:master, Time: 2019-04-06_20:07:58 Locale: ro-RO (ro_RO.UTF-8); UI-Language: en-US Calc: threaded
(In reply to Xisco Faulí from comment #5) > Created attachment 150622 [details] > output That's not the output that I obtained. In my case, there was just the image's frame (that was well centered and sized, contrarily to this output) that appeared. Also, if possible, I would like not to return to a much older version, for, with version 5.1.6.2, I had other bugs at print time (garbage appearing here and there on the printed pages, seemingly randomly). Those problems disappeared when I switched to version 6.2.2.2 — except for the one this whole thread is about. Finally, when you suggest to download a specific version, could you provide as well the link where it dwells ? I would fear, by just looking up a given version number, to find something irrelevant, or faulty. Remember that I run under Ubuntu 16.04 LTS. Thanks, you all ! Fred Lemire
An easy way to try old ones is using appimages: https://libreoffice.soluzioniopen.com/index.php/old-versions/ You just have to make them executable files and run them.
No repro Version: 6.3.0.0.alpha0+ Build ID: 0eaa0804085dd6e93257dd31361490720456679d CPU threads: 4; OS: Linux 4.15; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3;
(In reply to raal from comment #13) > No repro Version: 6.3.0.0.alpha0+ > Build ID: 0eaa0804085dd6e93257dd31361490720456679d > CPU threads: 4; OS: Linux 4.15; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3; Are you sure you selected "pages per sheet: 2"? I still repro. Arch Linux 64-bit Version: 6.3.0.0.alpha0+ Build ID: bcb0c9b4bee1d943d9c60f9d4512dba901f85f54 CPU threads: 8; OS: Linux 5.0; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3; Locale: fi-FI (fi_FI.UTF-8); UI-Language: en-US Calc: threaded Built on 20 April 2019
(In reply to Buovjaga from comment #14) > > Are you sure you selected "pages per sheet: 2"? I still repro. > my fault, sorry. Reproduced.
I tried to bibisect in5.2 but after first bad, I just get "Application Error". What I am supposed, to say skip dozen times or more? I cannot believe that 5.2 is in such a lousy condition. BTW, repro 6.4+
(In reply to Timur from comment #16) > I tried to bibisect in5.2 but after first bad, I just get "Application > Error". > What I am supposed, to say skip dozen times or more? > I cannot believe that 5.2 is in such a lousy condition. If the bisect issue happens so early on, we can just call this notBibisectable.
Application Error is not related to this file, I can't start LO at all. I tried dozen times and quit.
Dear Fred Lemire, To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo'; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: https://web.libera.chat/?settings=#libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug
Repro 7.2, no repro 7.3 and 7.5+. WFM.