Description: The first table in this *.doc document is rendered incorrectly. Reproduced in Libreoffice Writer 6.2.6, 6.3.1 and OpenOffice Writer 4.1.5. This table is displayed correctly in WPS Office and OnlyOffice DesktopEditors. I have not been able to make a minimal document with this problem. If I copy that table to a new document in WPS Office and save it as doc or docx, LibreOffice displays it correctly. Steps to Reproduce: . Actual Results: . Expected Results: . Reproducible: Always User Profile Reset: No Additional Info: .
Created attachment 154114 [details] Original document with problem.doc
Created attachment 154115 [details] How the 1st table must be displayed correctly.png
Created attachment 154116 [details] How the 1st table is displayed incorrectly in LibreOffice.png
I confirm it with Version: 6.4.0.0.alpha0+ (x64) Build ID: 01837a85004a6f891a09c0a63ed7eff75d634827 CPU threads: 4; OS: Windows 10.0; UI render: GL; VCL: win; TinderBox: Win-x86_64@62-TDF, Branch:master, Time: 2019-09-01_00:07:05 Locale: en-GB (de_DE); UI-Language: en-US Calc: threaded It is not a table but a text frame (regarding to informations from the navigator) => I updated bug summary
Also reproduced in Version: 5.2.0.0.alpha1+ Build ID: 5b168b3fa568e48e795234dc5fa454bf24c9805e CPU Threads: 4; OS Version: Linux 4.15; UI Render: default; Locale: ca-ES (ca_ES.UTF-8 Version 4.1.0.0.alpha0+ (Build ID: efca6f15609322f62a35619619a6d5fe5c9bd5a)
Created attachment 154935 [details] Minimized DOC
Created attachment 154936 [details] Minimized DOCX
Created attachment 154937 [details] Minimized DOC and DOCX in MSO and LO 6.4+ Table in frame is not shown only if grouped. If not grouped, shown both from DOC and DOCX in LO 6.4+.
This is not really a frame in doc or docx, but simple grouped shape. Since grouped shapes are still not imported as writer textframes ( https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100074#c11 ) "tables in grouped shapes" is one more things that cannot be imported/shown properly - see bug #128770 for the rest.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 66039 ***