When a drawing is exported as EPSF, the title is always set to "none". Could this field be taken from the document title instead, as happens for PDF files?
Can not confirm. An export will pick up the name of the Draw ODG file being edited and exported--file extension will then match the export filter format.
Thank you for reporting the bug. Please attach a sample document, as this makes it easier for us to verify the bug. (Please note that the attachment will be public, remove any sensitive information before attaching it. See https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/FAQ#How_can_I_eliminate_confidential_data_from_a_sample_document.3F for help on how to do so.) I have set the bug's status to 'NEEDINFO'. Please change it back to 'UNCONFIRMED' once the requested document is provided.
Created attachment 155286 [details] EPSF with "%%Tile: none" at line 5 This EPS file was generated from the same sample ODG file provided for bug 128265 which has "Test of mulit-line text box rotation" in the document title field in properties.
As implemented, those strings internal to the exported EPS image are hard coded in the export filter [1]. Not clear there is any advantage to adding a value internally--it is otherwise valid EPS. =-ref-= https://opengrok.libreoffice.org/xref/core/filter/source/graphicfilter/eps/eps.cxx?&r=241bee7e&h=455#455
I think the choice should be between having a valid value from the document properties or not include the %%Title: field at all.
(In reply to Gerry Garvey from comment #5) > I think the choice should be between having a valid value from the document > properties or not include the %%Title: field at all. Why? The EPS File Format v3.0 compliant as is with the "recommended" Comments hard-coded. Some over zealous validation tools would likely complain if there is no entry. The useful comment of %%Creator is populated with the generator details. The "%%Title: None", "%%CreationDate: None", "%%Pages: 0" comments can be directly edited in any text editor for those rare users that might need to see the comments in some external application--no significance to LibreOffice.
(In reply to V Stuart Foote from comment #6) > (In reply to Gerry Garvey from comment #5) > > I think the choice should be between having a valid value from the document > > properties or not include the %%Title: field at all. > > Why? The EPS File Format v3.0 compliant as is with the "recommended" > Comments hard-coded. Some over zealous validation tools would likely > complain if there is no entry. > > The useful comment of %%Creator is populated with the generator details. > > The "%%Title: None", "%%CreationDate: None", "%%Pages: 0" comments can be > directly edited in any text editor for those rare users that might need to > see the comments in some external application--no significance to > LibreOffice. Closing as RESOLVED NOTOURBUG