Created attachment 162966 [details] Example file This bug was filed from the crash reporting server and is br-ca82641f-3975-46fa-bb1c-f6b1368c7230. ========================================= 1. Open the attached file 2. Open a new file 3. Insert 2 sections -> insert section 4. Paste content from the attached file in both sections 5. Paste below the second 6. Undo everything 7. Redo everything -> More those bugs reports already around so likely a dupe, but you never know
Created attachment 162967 [details] Screencast
No crash with Versie: 4.4.7.2 Build ID: f3153a8b245191196a4b6b9abd1d0da16eead600 Locale: nl_NL
Also in 6.0 and in 5.2
Created attachment 163328 [details] backtrace on Linux The crash happened on the fourth Redo. This is from commit 0d45380c, configured --with-vendor=Terrence Enger --with-jdk-home=/usr/lib/jvm/default-java --enable-split-debug --enable-gdb-index --enable-ld=gold --enable-option-checking=fatal #--enable-dbgutil --enable-debug --without-system-postgresql --without-myspell-dicts --with-extra-buildid --without-doxygen --with-external-tar=/home/terry/lo_hacking/git/src --without-package-format built and running on debain-buster. I am setting keyword haveBacktrace and blocks Crash-Assert.
I am giving up my attempt to bibisect this bug. Working on debian-buster in bibisect-linux-64-6.0, after I bibisected down to an entirely implausible commit, I have determined: (*) One commit can give both crash and no-crash results. (*) Slowing down execution of undo and redo (my test had 5 times "<ctrl>+Z" then 5 times "<ctrl>+Y") seems to increase the likelihood of a crash. (*) In version oldest, I reached an apparent successful end of the test (no crash yet; LO responded to <left> <left>) and then typed "<ctrl>+X k" (old habit from emacs). *Now* LO crashed with SIGABRT from a STL function called from frame #14 in SwOutlineNodes::Seek_Entry; this is like the other disable-debug crashes I have looked into.
Based on similarity of backtraces, I am marking this report DUPLICATE of bug 134626. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 134626 ***
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 119241 ***