Description: For example, the new dialog named as Additions appears in Commands Section, Menus tab, Customize Dialog(Tools-Customize). However, I would like to point out that if it is added via the customize dialog, it is not available on menus, or etc. If we prevent these commands from appearing in the list, the problem will be solved. Steps to Reproduce: 1.Open tools menu, and press "Customize..." 2.Select "Menus" tab, and write Additions to Search text box. 3.You will see the Additions on Available Commands section. Actual Results: I didn't select the "Enable experimental features" from Tools-Options-LibreOfficeDev-Advanced section. However, Additions text appeared in Customize search result. Expected Results: Additions... shouldn't appear in Customize Dialog search result, if the user didn't select "Enable experimental features". Reproducible: Always User Profile Reset: Yes OpenGL enabled: Yes Additional Info: Version: 7.1.0.0.alpha0+ Build ID: f29ff351424c38e343948ecb322b723a984ef907 CPU threads: 12; OS: Linux 5.3; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3 Locale: en-US (en_US.UTF-8); UI: en-US Calc: CL
Created attachment 163009 [details] Customize dialog result
Created attachment 163010 [details] Experimental option is not selected
I confirm, but I also see "Record macro" in the actual macro menu and it is in a disabled state. So it is not hidden. Let's ask UX team for their take on this.
Not a UX topic. But Maxim, I vaguely that we had such a discussion in the past and was a simple tweak to solve. Was it a day dream?
Is this a duplicate of Bug 116491?
(In reply to Thomas Lendo from comment #5) > Is this a duplicate of Bug 116491? Nope, this one is about the observation that experimental commands are listed and suggests to show those in italic.
Dear Yusuf Keten, To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo'; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: https://web.libera.chat/?settings=#libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug