Bug 138035 - CHARACtER STYLE DIALOG: Function of "Standard" button unclear
Summary: CHARACtER STYLE DIALOG: Function of "Standard" button unclear
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 128469
Alias: None
Product: LibreOffice
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Writer (show other bugs)
Version:
(earliest affected)
7.0.3.1 release
Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64) Windows (All)
: medium enhancement
Assignee: Not Assigned
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords: needsUXEval
Depends on:
Blocks: Writer-Styles-Character
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2020-11-06 11:23 UTC by canned
Modified: 2020-11-23 12:55 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Crash report or crash signature:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description canned 2020-11-06 11:23:22 UTC
Description:
Suggestion for improvement of the character style popup:

Actual Results:
The button "Standard" in the tab "Organizer" seems to have no function, but is clickable (irritating).

Expected Results:
It would be useful if you could reset ALL format settings (across all tabs) to the standard format by clicking the button "Standard" in the tab "Organizer" (german "Verwalten").


Reproducible: Always


User Profile Reset: No



Additional Info:
Version: 7.0.3.1 (x64)
Build ID: d7547858d014d4cf69878db179d326fc3483e082
CPU threads: 4; OS: Windows 6.1 Service Pack 1 Build 7601; UI render: Skia/Raster; VCL: win
Locale: de-DE (de_DE); UI: de-DE
Calc: threaded
Comment 1 Dieter 2020-11-21 17:40:21 UTC
I assume, it it the same as described in bug 128469 for paragraph style dialog. "Standard" resets the settings of the style to those of parent style. But that should at least be explained in LO Help.

So I see some options
1. Improve documentation
2. Mark this bug as duplicate of bug 128469 and extend bug 128469 to character style dialog
3. Something else????

=> Set to NEW, because it is at least parallel to bug 138469
cc: Design-Team for further input and decision
Comment 2 Heiko Tietze 2020-11-23 12:55:40 UTC
Thanks Dieter, let's follow your suggestion.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 128469 ***