Description: Brackets [] for bibliography reference lost on DOCX export (fine with DOC) Steps to Reproduce: 1. Open the attached file 2. Save to DOCX 3. File reload (note the field lacking brackets Actual Results: Lacking brackets [] Expected Results: Should be present (as in ODT and DOC) Reproducible: Always User Profile Reset: No Additional Info: Found in Version: 7.3.0.0.alpha0+ (x64) / LibreOffice Community Build ID: c38d0d501f5eca648bdf0fd2914b57e06f505f7e CPU threads: 4; OS: Windows 6.3 Build 9600; UI render: Skia/Raster; VCL: win Locale: nl-NL (nl_NL); UI: en-US Calc: CL and in Version: 6.3.7.0.0+ (x86) Build ID: 726535ec30f12697ceccd2f0640d9371a64dc5bd CPU threads: 4; OS: Windows 6.3; UI render: default; VCL: win; Locale: nl-NL (nl_NL); UI-Language: en-US Calc: CL not in Version: 6.2.5.0.0+ Build ID: 92400e8df9f704ac4856dbb85d8551a0488fd334 CPU threads: 4; OS: Windows 6.3; UI render: GL; VCL: win; Locale: nl-NL (nl_NL); UI-Language: en-US Calc: CL
Created attachment 173308 [details] Example file
Repro NixOS Version: 7.3.0.0.alpha0+ / LibreOffice Community Build ID: b1df9c67349cf4cc5be4128d797aefb87f50e38f CPU threads: 16; OS: Linux 5.13; UI render: default; VCL: x11 Locale: fi-FI (fi_FI.UTF-8); UI: en-US Calc: threaded
If DOCX is open in MSO, both 6.2 and 6.3 are just 'abc' with no brackets, so not a regression, rather an incomplete fix. I did a bibisect for change in LO. from '[CITATION "abc"]' to 'abc'. commit b918991be825ff993d8afdd1b740d4d7f7f28427 Date: Thu Oct 10 15:49:05 2019 +0200 source 420c306394ff781fb361f1fb12b5b993a67dd36b previous 4396bfa7c05b8578ed4ea54a6db85afc84e0a683 author Xisco Fauli <xiscofauli@libreoffice.org> 2019-09-24 21:22:30 +0200 committer Miklos Vajna <vmiklos@collabora.com> 2019-10-10 10:48:39 +0200 tdf#107784: DOCX Import: Show citation's title in fields (2nd take) Underlying is bug 105367. There it says that "[ CITATION "ABC"]" instead of "[ABC]" was fixed, but it's not for brackets.
Dear Telesto, To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo'; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: https://web.libera.chat/?settings=#libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug