Bug 146076 (Find&Replace-Regex) - [META] Find & Replace Regular Expressions
Summary: [META] Find & Replace Regular Expressions
Status: NEW
Alias: Find&Replace-Regex
Product: LibreOffice
Classification: Unclassified
Component: LibreOffice (show other bugs)
Version:
(earliest affected)
unspecified
Hardware: All All
: medium normal
Assignee: Not Assigned
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on: 38261 38551 106137 108256 128999 135538 138931 145806 149491 158894 161932 165930 165931 165938 34596 129187 130480 133084 139585 145774 146796 152847 152959 156284 159607 165724 165725
Blocks: Find-Search
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2021-12-06 13:59 UTC by Michael Warner
Modified: 2025-03-28 21:35 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Crash report or crash signature:


Attachments
revisited description with screenshots what goes wrong (635.75 KB, application/vnd.oasis.opendocument.text)
2022-06-01 06:32 UTC, Adalbert Hanßen
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Michael Warner 2021-12-06 13:59:53 UTC
Description:
Meta bug for issues specific to Find and Replace of regular expressions.

Actual Results:
.

Expected Results:
.


Reproducible: Always


User Profile Reset: No



Additional Info:
.
Comment 1 Adalbert Hanßen 2022-06-01 06:32:18 UTC
Created attachment 180512 [details]
revisited description with screenshots what goes wrong
Comment 2 Heiko Tietze 2025-03-17 08:01:04 UTC
Why not use bug 38261 as the mother of all "f&r with regex" topics?
Comment 3 Eyal Rozenberg 2025-03-28 21:26:33 UTC
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #2)
> Why not use bug 38261 as the mother of all "f&r with regex" topics?

Because that one is not a meta-bug, it's super-messy.

Also, I'm going to do a bit of cleanup here...
Comment 4 Eyal Rozenberg 2025-03-28 21:33:40 UTC
Comment on attachment 180512 [details]
revisited description with screenshots what goes wrong

I'm marking this attachment obsolete for several reasons:

1. It is originally a document regarding bug 139584, not this bug.
2. We tend to "conduct business" on Bugzilla using Bugzilla comments, not attached documents; those support or complement comments.
3. This is a meta-bug, so we should generally avoid discussion of specific suggestions, requests or bugs - relegating them to dependent bugs.
4. That one document has multiple suggestions and complaints, each meriting its own bug; and some already captured by an existing bug.

Adalbert, I'm very appreciative of your work, illustrating problems you've encountered. But we should "chew up" the results of that work into pieces which are digestible by LO developers, QA contributors, and UI/UX people.
Comment 5 Eyal Rozenberg 2025-03-28 21:35:43 UTC
This should not block bug 113136 (Find&Replace-Dialog), since there are bugs which regard regular expressions but not the dialog. So, both meta-bugs are relevant - but they are independent. Individual bugs should block either one, or both, as relevant (and I'll go make sure that's the case).