Open attached DOCX (same for old and new format). See problem with text in diagram, regardless if grouped. DOCX is MSO extracted from bug 76513 larger DOCX.
Created attachment 178111 [details] Sample compared in MSO, LO 6.0, 7.3, 7.4+ in Windows Ungrouped seems like always wrong, but text was seen in 5.2 and not all from 5.3. Grouped seemed better, looked good with 6.0, then also seen in 6.1 but somewhat changed to worse, then diagram wrong and text seen in 6.2, then diagram corrected up to 7.3, then text not seen in 7.4+.
Created attachment 178112 [details] Sample DOCX from MSO with compatibility
My screenshot of master 7.4+ where text is missing is in Windows with Build: 583185235389b55d6cfffac3067c0e1ccb2852b1. I see some text in Linux with 4-days old Build ID: d5f015185240a7bddfed7ddf10d6b5426e35fb72. So not sure if Win-Lin difference or some latest change.
Hi Attila. You are very recent with those DOCX groups, please see.
Created attachment 178119 [details] How it looks in Word and Writer 7.4 Hi! What is the exact problem? All textboxes has the same parameters like in Word, so i do know what do you mean exactly? If you attach an image marked with the problem and a good version, it could help. Thanks :) (During you attach that i try to fix the other regression )
Created attachment 178120 [details] Sample compared in MSO, LO 6.0, 7.3, 7.4+ in Windows Here is a screenshot with marked text progblem.
As seen in attachment 178120 [details], in latest master I don't see text in Grouped (and it's not well in Ungrouped). In order to see text, I have to mark Grouped and press Arrow Down/Up.
As seen in attachment 178120 [details], in latest master I don't see text in Grouped (and it's not well in Ungrouped). In order to see text, I have to mark Grouped and press Arrow Down/Up. But, I retested with a new profile and text is shown as in attachment 178119 [details]. So this bug boils down just to "text is there but not see all to the bottom".
Created attachment 178124 [details] The problem enlarged Well i see. However that problem what you mention not really a textbox specific bug, rather it is a text handling problem. Later i will check it again.
Text in Grouped became worse (touched the line), bibisect Lin-6.1: commit f7f94bad44fb21c50b1aa01221cf61c739e19101 Date: Wed Jan 16 15:54:35 2019 +0100 source ba7435e5914a713730265c3378ce616de543667f prev 3376b0e94f0638c927a37c32322bf67d42ebb00f author Miklos Vajna <vmiklos@collabora.com> 2018-12-17 tdf#121804 DOCX import: handle sub/superscript inside group shapes Text in Grouped became bad(out of the line), bibisect Lin-7.4: commit a0018b7bdfa3b444f90e432d5a8e79ae55feb96d Date: Mon Jan 3 14:43:29 2022 +0100 source 2951cbdf3a6e2b62461665546b47e1d253fcb834 prev cce57fd94e9335c5dd5f3725a5fe54f5d3929e8d author Attila Bakos (NISZ) <bakos.attilakaroly@nisz.hu> 2021-11-10 tdf#143574 OOXML export/import of textboxes in group shapes
(In reply to Timur from comment #10) > Text in Grouped became worse (touched the line), bibisect Lin-6.1: > commit f7f94bad44fb21c50b1aa01221cf61c739e19101 > Date: Wed Jan 16 15:54:35 2019 +0100 > source ba7435e5914a713730265c3378ce616de543667f > prev 3376b0e94f0638c927a37c32322bf67d42ebb00f > author Miklos Vajna <vmiklos@collabora.com> 2018-12-17 > tdf#121804 DOCX import: handle sub/superscript inside group shapes > > Text in Grouped became bad(out of the line), bibisect Lin-7.4: > commit a0018b7bdfa3b444f90e432d5a8e79ae55feb96d > Date: Mon Jan 3 14:43:29 2022 +0100 > source 2951cbdf3a6e2b62461665546b47e1d253fcb834 > prev cce57fd94e9335c5dd5f3725a5fe54f5d3929e8d > author Attila Bakos (NISZ) <bakos.attilakaroly@nisz.hu> 2021-11-10 > tdf#143574 OOXML export/import of textboxes in group shapes According to https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=178120 the text missing from the grouped shape what is now fixed by https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/129627/9 i think, and it opens as the ungrouped one (see https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=178124 ) So there is two problem: the first one has a fix in gerrit the second is independent from me as your attachment shows in 6.0) Which one is this bug-report about?
This one is about original grouped shape, Ungrouped can be another bug. Thanks.
Another file that regressed from 2951cbdf3a6e2b62461665546b47e1d253fcb834 in 7.4+ on fileopen is DOCX saved from FODT attachment 118188 [details].
Created attachment 182247 [details] Sample compared in MSO, LO 6.0, 7.3, 7.4+, 7.5+ in Windows As explained, grouped now in 7.5+ opens as ungrouped, both missing a bottom. So this bug remains open.
(In reply to Timur from comment #14) > Created attachment 182247 [details] > Sample compared in MSO, LO 6.0, 7.3, 7.4+, 7.5+ in Windows > > As explained, grouped now in 7.5+ opens as ungrouped, both missing a bottom. > So this bug remains open. Why opens that un-grouped? It is have to be grouped and having textbox for each shape having the text inside, what has the same behaviour like the simple shape with textbox had before, am i right?
(In reply to Attila Bakos (NISZ) from comment #15) > Why opens that un-grouped? It is have to be grouped and having textbox for > each shape having the text inside, what has the same behaviour like the > simple shape with textbox had before, am i right? Sorry, I don' understand.
(In reply to Timur from comment #16) > (In reply to Attila Bakos (NISZ) from comment #15) > > Why opens that un-grouped? It is have to be grouped and having textbox for > > each shape having the text inside, what has the same behaviour like the > > simple shape with textbox had before, am i right? > > Sorry, I don' understand. Sorry. I just wanted to ask you about the grouping of the shape. Because before when my patch has been merged, the group shape was still there and it was one group with as many text-frames, as many shapes supposed to have text inside. As I see in your picture the number of the frames sill the same, and i wonder if the shape has been grouped. If not, that means there is another regression as well. The current state have to be the same (or better if someone did a fix) as the single shape and frame has (The upper one is the single object if i remember well, the bottom is the group, and they looks the same) If i not clear just write back, thanks.