Description: It seems to be impossible to install any extension for all users (shared extension) on MacOS. And impossible to launch unopkg gui for all users. It worked fine before. So it's a regression. See my screen captures. Steps to Reproduce: 1. Put the InterActiveConsoleDDP.oxt file in your Documents folder 2. Launch Terminal 3. Run command like screen capture Actual Results: The extension can't be installed Expected Results: Installed extension for ALL users. Reproducible: Always User Profile Reset: No Additional Info: It worked fine before, so it seems to be a regression.
Created attachment 185921 [details] My command line See the command line to use to install the extension for all users
Created attachment 185922 [details] Provided extension An extension for testings.
Created attachment 185923 [details] Command line to launch unopkg gui for all users Impossible to launch unopkg gui for all users.
It works fine with LO 6.0 but not with LO 7.0 So it's a regression between this two releases.
Created attachment 185947 [details] The terminal with LO 6.0
Created attachment 185948 [details] Souris extension is really installed in LO6 for all users
Created attachment 185949 [details] Souris extension for tests
@Didier : we are talking about the version the TDF download from the project website ? The version of LibreOffice from the app store doesn't appear to have the unopkg command line tool any more, or at least I can't find it in the bundle. Somehow, I can still install extensions into the user config though via the LO Extension Manager UI (not sure which command is being called when it does that though, if unopkg is absent). I will open a separate report for this. I can confirm that when using the command line you have posted, I get the same error message as you with Version: 7.4.5.1 / LibreOffice Community (TDF download) Build ID: 9c0871452b3918c1019dde9bfac75448afc4b57f CPU threads: 8; OS: Mac OS X 13.2.1; UI render: Skia/Raster; VCL: osx Locale: fr-FR (fr_FR.UTF-8); UI: fr-FR Calc: threaded
@Alex: Yes, all my downloads are coming from TDF. As I said in comment 4, it works fine with LO 6.0 and not with 7.0
I confirm : all is ok with LO 6.4.7 (last 6.4). The problem comes with LO 7.0.0
Hello, Is there anyone to fix this bug ? Thanks. Didier.
(In reply to Dorange-Pattoret Didier from comment #11) > Hello, > Is there anyone to fix this bug ? > Thanks. > Didier. Unfortunately, probably not immediately. It would need to be bibisected, but someone has flagged it as "notbibisectable", although I don't understand why exactly, perhaps because the bibisect range is too large ?
Hello, Thanks for your explanations. Simply : I do not think the range for bibisect is too large : the problem came beetwin LO 6.4.7 and 7.0
(In reply to Dorange-Pattoret Didier from comment #13) > Hello, > Thanks for your explanations. > Simply : I do not think the range for bibisect is too large : the problem > came beetwin LO 6.4.7 and 7.0 According to the help explanation of the keyword "notbibisectable", a reason is supposed to be given why it isn't. This doesn't seem to have been the case here.
It's not bibisectable, because to bibisect it, one would need to *install* each build on the system; that needs a package for each bibisect build, which is absent.
Hello Mike, It works fine until LO 24.2.2 And no more with LO > 24.2.2 Thanls for youy help.
(In reply to Dorange-Pattoret Didier from comment #16) > Hello Mike, > > It works fine until LO 24.2.2 > > And no more with LO > 24.2.2 > > Thanls for youy help. In comment 10 you said: I confirm : all is ok with LO 6.4.7 (last 6.4). The problem comes with LO 7.0.0 now you said: no more with LO > 24.2.2. Which version is the first one with problems?
(In reply to BogdanB from comment #17) > (In reply to Dorange-Pattoret Didier from comment #16) > > Hello Mike, > > > > It works fine until LO 24.2.2 > > > > And no more with LO > 24.2.2 > > > > Thanls for youy help. > > In comment 10 you said: > I confirm : all is ok with LO 6.4.7 (last 6.4). The problem comes with LO > 7.0.0 > > now you said: no more with LO > 24.2.2. > > Which version is the first one with problems? I'm sorry. I maid a mistake. Now I'm sure I can say : It works until : Version: 6.4.7.2 Build ID: 639b8ac485750d5696d7590a72ef1b496725cfb5 CPU threads: 4; OS: Mac OS X 10.16; UI render: default; VCL: osx; Locale: fr-FR (fr_FR.UTF-8); UI-Language: en-US Calc: threaded and no more with : Version: 7.0.0.1 Build ID: 04ba7e3f1e51af6c5d653e543a620e36719083fd CPU threads: 4; OS: Mac OS X 10.16; UI render: default; VCL: osx Locale: fr-FR (fr_FR.UTF-8); UI: en-US Calc: threaded Regarding version 25, I confused it with the bug number 168739 https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=168739 I'm sorry...