Created attachment 188527 [details] Sample slide (PPTX) Compare the screenshots of the attached document in PowerPoint (online) vs Impress and notice how in the former the chart labels 1..., 2..., etc. nicely line break and fit the available space where in LibreOffice it's one line of text at an angle - that does not fit at all. Version: 24.2.0.0.alpha0+ (X86_64) / LibreOffice Community Build ID: 77fca616e0bd79e0b405fd0b3543cf8e94e15df3 CPU threads: 8; OS: Linux 6.4; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3 Locale: en-US (en_US.UTF-8); UI: en-US Calc: threaded
Created attachment 188528 [details] Visual comparison Office 365 (left) vs LibreOffice (right)
Already looks like that in Version: 6.4.8.0.0+ Build ID: 99b065ec31d032fc08ab14f66430dac4fef904a5 CPU threads: 8; OS: Linux 6.4; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3; TinderBox: Linux-rpm_deb-x86_64@86-TDF, Branch:libreoffice-6-4, Time: 2020-10-08_08:57:08 Locale: en-US (en_US.UTF-8); UI-Language: en-US
Yup. Hello text length based automatic rotation, my old nightmare. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 142328 ***
Gabor, I think we are looking at something different here, but correct me if I'm wrong. In 6.3, labels were not rotated but not wrapped. In 6.4.7.2, They are rotated. Also reproduced the issue as described in: Version: 24.2.0.0.alpha0+ (X86_64) / LibreOffice Community Build ID: 46d7119b8be03968017e59d882e5671350304e15 CPU threads: 8; OS: Linux 5.15; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3 Locale: en-AU (en_AU.UTF-8); UI: en-US Calc: threaded But coincidentally, looks good in: Version: 24.2.0.0.alpha0+ (X86_64) / LibreOffice Community Build ID: 94caaf5c9e2917a3202cf515d61eaa9399b2c2b5 CPU threads: 8; OS: Linux 5.15; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3 Locale: en-AU (en_AU.UTF-8); UI: en-US Calc: threaded (whereas bug 142328 is still not fixed, still looks like attachment 172790 [details]) So it must have been fixed by something in those recent commits: https://git.libreoffice.org/core/+log/46d7119b8be03968017e59d882e5671350304e15..94caaf5c9e2917a3202cf515d61eaa9399b2c2b5/?s=142082d216cf48bc905c2468809bcc074fe2c638 Marking as "works for me" until a fix can be identified. Gabor, any insights on what XML element we are looking for in bug 142328?
(In reply to Stéphane Guillou (stragu) from comment #4) > https://git.libreoffice.org/core/+log/ > 46d7119b8be03968017e59d882e5671350304e15.. > 94caaf5c9e2917a3202cf515d61eaa9399b2c2b5/ > ?s=142082d216cf48bc905c2468809bcc074fe2c638 ... actually, make that https://git.libreoffice.org/core/+log/46d7119b8be03968017e59d882e5671350304e15..94caaf5c9e2917a3202cf515d61eaa9399b2c2b5
(In reply to Stéphane Guillou (stragu) from comment #4) > Marking as "works for me" until a fix can be identified. > Gabor, any insights on what XML element we are looking for in bug 142328? Sure, we are looking into a missing feature here. It's an MSO behavior with charts, demonstrated there by the same chart/dataset in the same file, but with different chart area widths. This file also shows it, if you play with it in PP. If you have some long data label and horizontal rotation is set, but no exact rotation value set (which is true in this example file, hence duplicate), then MSO measures the text length and according to the chart width, decides how does it fit best: for wide charts it shows the labels horizontally like the UI suggests. If there is less space available, it will rotate to 45 degrees, and if there is very little space it will rotate to 90 degrees left. It does this in editing mode as well, if you make the chart area wider/narrower. What you may see (I see the 45 degrees rotation on 2 days old builds instead of 0) may be accidental improvement in this particular file, but I doubt the proper text measuring/online resizing feature got implemented overnight.
(In reply to Stéphane Guillou (stragu) from comment #4) > But coincidentally, looks good in: > > Version: 24.2.0.0.alpha0+ (X86_64) / LibreOffice Community > Build ID: 94caaf5c9e2917a3202cf515d61eaa9399b2c2b5 > CPU threads: 8; OS: Linux 5.15; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3 > Locale: en-AU (en_AU.UTF-8); UI: en-US Now, with Version: 24.2.0.0.alpha0+ (X86_64) / LibreOffice Community Build ID: e60ef8651cfb30335471d1622e58c13eebc7d58b CPU threads: 8; OS: Linux 6.4; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3 Locale: en-US (en_US.UTF-8); UI: en-US it looks like when I reported the issue, that is, Attachment #188528 [details]. Instead of line wrapping the labels, LibreOffice renders them at a 45° angle running into the list of labels below. > (whereas bug 142328 is still not fixed, still looks like attachment 172790 [details] > [details]) In terms of its title bug #142328 indeed looks like it covers this. Alas the example there does not have a case where labels are to be wrapped. Should we keep this one separately, making it a dependency of the other one?
Comment #7 was tested with Version: 24.2.0.0.alpha0+ (X86_64) / LibreOffice Community Build ID: e60ef8651cfb30335471d1622e58c13eebc7d58b CPU threads: 8; OS: Linux 6.4; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3 Locale: en-US (en_US.UTF-8); UI: en-US
(In reply to Gerald Pfeifer from comment #7) > Now, with > > Version: 24.2.0.0.alpha0+ (X86_64) / LibreOffice Community > Build ID: e60ef8651cfb30335471d1622e58c13eebc7d58b > CPU threads: 8; OS: Linux 6.4; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3 > Locale: en-US (en_US.UTF-8); UI: en-US > > it looks like when I reported the issue, that is, Attachment #188528 [details] > Instead of line wrapping the labels, LibreOffice renders them at a > 45° angle running into the list of labels below. I see the labels horizontal and wrapped as a side-effect of: commit 4b743de97fc133623e46827869c4ea3eb845ad47 author Khaled Hosny Mon Jul 17 12:38:41 2023 +0300 committer خالد حسني Sun Jul 23 06:01:56 2023 +0200 tdf#156234: Don’t round glyph coordinates when doing subpixel positioning But if I add some characters to a label, or increase the font size, or reduce the chart width, it goes back to single line on a 45° rotation. On Office.com, reducing the chart width will have the same effect: 45° rotation, and eventually vertical labels. LO does not get to vertical labels and instead displays every other one. So I guess the issue is that we have a different threshold than MSO between wrapped and rotated, and that we don't have the vertical label mode implemented? Which is what Gabor was explaining?